> Hi freebsd-net@,
>
> Long time no see. I've gotten a (Ports) commit bit since then.
>
> I haven't been very active in TCP/IP hacking as of late, as more
> recently I've been more focused on GNOME packages and some GPU drivers.
>
> Going back, I'm thinking about porting OpenBSD's MPLS to FreeB
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 11:17:42AM -0800, Neel Chauhan wrote:
> * Is porting OpenBSD MPLS to FreeBSD feasible, or are we better off doing
> a from-scratch implementation based on netgraph?
I'd prefer a netgraph approach, if possible.
It helps to concentrate on the important things.
> * Would s
Hi freebsd-net@,
Long time no see. I've gotten a (Ports) commit bit since then.
I haven't been very active in TCP/IP hacking as of late, as more
recently I've been more focused on GNOME packages and some GPU drivers.
Going back, I'm thinking about porting OpenBSD's MPLS to FreeBSD.
I have a
(When did FreeBSD-net become about antenna theory?)
The answer (of course) is, “it depends”. Mostly on “what bands” though your
antenna and cables will have some effect as well.
Some WiFi cards these days employ a form of beamforming or even MIMO. Older
cards could use selection diversity t
On 19/11/2021 20:19, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Here is some data to demonstrate the issue:
$1 = (iflib_rxq_t) 0xfe00ea9f6200
(kgdb) p $1->ifr_frags[0]
$2 = {irf_flid = 0 '\000', irf_idx = 1799, irf_len = 118}
(kgdb) p $1->ifr_frags[1]
$3 = {irf_flid = 1 '\001', irf_idx = 674, irf_len = 0}
(kgdb) p
I am using my FreeBSD box as my main ingress to my RV trailer. We move
around and sometimes use Ethernet, sometimes PPP directly on DSL and
sometimes we connect to a local wifi hotspot. To get the best connection I
have mounted an external, multi-band antenna on the trailer and connect it
to
We have infrequent but persistent crashes at work where a part of an iflib_rxq_t
object seems to be overwritten by a sequence of if_rxd_frag objects.
Those if_rxd_frag elements look like a continuation of the ifr_frags array in an
adjacent iflib_rxq_t object.
This happens only on VMWare only
Hi!
> > > There's one small diff between the two that I do not understand:
> > > - 18040 times no signature provided by segment
> > > + 18045 times no signature provided by segment
> >
> > This means, that received TCP segment has not TCP-MD5 signature, but
> > listen socket expects
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259458
Andriy Gapon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |a...@freebsd.org
Statu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259458
--- Comment #20 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=1bfdb812c786ac2607a82633f9c84a5d16f54079
commit 1bfdb812c786ac2607a82633f9c84a5d16f54079
Author:
10 matches
Mail list logo