[Bug 213370] Kernel panic with ng_tcpmss

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213370 --- Comment #2 from Andrey --- Hello. This is maybe actual for FreeBSD-10.3. I stopped using FreeBSD after that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

Re: Erratic ping behavior, was Re: Pi3 answers ssh only if outbound ping is running on -current

[The USB I/O problem.] On 2022-Mar-13, at 13:46, Mark Millard wrote: >> FreeBSD pelorus.zefox.org 13.1-STABLE FreeBSD 13.1-STABLE #24 >> stable/13-n249989-b85d0d603c5: Sat Mar 12 17:47:19 PST 2022 >> b...@pelorus.zefox.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC arm64 > >> . . . >> >>

Problem reports for n...@freebsd.org that need special attention

To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and ob

Re: Erratic ping behavior, was Re: Pi3 answers ssh only if outbound ping is running on -current

On 2022-Mar-13, at 12:34, bob prohaska wrote: > It looks as if things are somewhat altered, but not really > improved, after updating to > > FreeBSD pelorus.zefox.org 13.1-STABLE FreeBSD 13.1-STABLE #24 > stable/13-n249989-b85d0d603c5: Sat Mar 12 17:47:19 PST 2022 > b...@pelorus.zefox.or

Re: Erratic ping behavior, was Re: Pi3 answers ssh only if outbound ping is running on -current

It looks as if things are somewhat altered, but not really improved, after updating to FreeBSD pelorus.zefox.org 13.1-STABLE FreeBSD 13.1-STABLE #24 stable/13-n249989-b85d0d603c5: Sat Mar 12 17:47:19 PST 2022 b...@pelorus.zefox.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC arm64 on the P

Re: epair and vnet jail loose connection.

On 13 Mar 2022, at 17:45, Michael Gmelin wrote: On 13. Mar 2022, at 18:16, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On 13 Mar 2022, at 16:33, Michael Gmelin wrote: It's important to point out that this only happens with kern.ncpu>1. With kern.ncpu==1 nothing gets stuck. This perfectly fits into the picture,

Re: epair and vnet jail loose connection.

> On 13. Mar 2022, at 18:16, Bjoern A. Zeeb > wrote: > > On 13 Mar 2022, at 16:33, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> It's important to point out that this only happens with kern.ncpu>1. >> With kern.ncpu==1 nothing gets stuck. >> >> This perfectly fits into the picture, since, as pointed out by Joha

Re: epair and vnet jail loose connection.

On 13 Mar 2022, at 16:33, Michael Gmelin wrote: It's important to point out that this only happens with kern.ncpu>1. With kern.ncpu==1 nothing gets stuck. This perfectly fits into the picture, since, as pointed out by Johan, the first commit that is affected[0] is about multicore support. Igno

Re: epair and vnet jail loose connection.

On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 14:32:50 +0100 Johan Hendriks wrote: > On 13/03/2022 14:06, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > i was a bit puzzled by Michael using bhyve trying to reproduce. > > Up until now I thought bhyve uses tap and not epair? > > > > Anyway ... > > > >> Am 13.03.2022 um 1

Re: epair and vnet jail loose connection.

On 13/03/2022 14:06, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hi all, i was a bit puzzled by Michael using bhyve trying to reproduce. Up until now I thought bhyve uses tap and not epair? Anyway ... Am 13.03.2022 um 14:01 schrieb Johan Hendriks : I have no idea why it does not work on my setup, which is not

Re: epair and vnet jail loose connection.

> On 13. Mar 2022, at 14:07, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > Hi all, > > i was a bit puzzled by Michael using bhyve trying to reproduce. > Up until now I thought bhyve uses tap and not epair? > In my setup, FreeBSD 14 runs on a bhyve vm, hosting the jails, which use vnet. Bare metal -> FreeB

Re: epair and vnet jail loose connection.

> On 13 Mar 2022, at 08:01, Johan Hendriks wrote: > >  >> On 13/03/2022 13:37, Kristof Provost wrote: >>> On 13 Mar 2022, at 5:26, Johan Hendriks wrote: >>> Copyd my haproxy en web01 jail to this machine and have the same problem. >>> >> Do you mean you can or cannot reproduce it on the seco

Re: epair and vnet jail loose connection.

Hi all, i was a bit puzzled by Michael using bhyve trying to reproduce. Up until now I thought bhyve uses tap and not epair? Anyway ... > Am 13.03.2022 um 14:01 schrieb Johan Hendriks : > I have no idea why it does not work on my setup, which is nothing out of the > ordinary i think, basic full

Re: epair and vnet jail loose connection.

On 13/03/2022 13:37, Kristof Provost wrote: On 13 Mar 2022, at 5:26, Johan Hendriks wrote: Copyd my haproxy en web01 jail to this machine and have the same problem. Do you mean you can or cannot reproduce it on the second machine? I have the same problem. Could it be a sysctl i use? or b

Re: epair and vnet jail loose connection.

On 13 Mar 2022, at 5:26, Johan Hendriks wrote: > Copyd my haproxy en web01 jail to this machine and have the same problem. > Do you mean you can or cannot reproduce it on the second machine? > Could it be a sysctl i use? or boot/loader.conf setting. > None of those settings strike me as likely to

Re: epair and vnet jail loose connection.

> On 13. Mar 2022, at 11:27, Johan Hendriks wrote: >  > > > Op zo 13 mrt. 2022 01:17 schreef Michael Gmelin : >> I also gave it another go (this time with multiple CPUs assigned to the vm), >> still works just fine - so I think we would need more details about the >> setup. >> >> Would it

Re: epair and vnet jail loose connection.

Op zo 13 mrt. 2022 01:17 schreef Michael Gmelin : > I also gave it another go (this time with multiple CPUs assigned to the > vm), still works just fine - so I think we would need more details about > the setup. > > Would it make sense to share our test setups, so Johan can try to > reproduce with