I am laughing so hard that I had to open some windows to get more oxygen!
On Friday, August 14, 2015 1:30 PM, Maxim Sobolev sobo...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hi guys, unfortunately no, neither reduction of the number of queues from 8
to 6 nor pinning interrupt rate at 2 per queue have
% cpu usage is a better question to ask than the one
you're asking.
BC
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 9:29 PM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net
freebsd-net@freebsd.org wrote:
Wow, this is really important! if this is a college project, I give you a D.
Maybe a D- because it's almost useless
Wow, this is really important! if this is a college project, I give you a D.
Maybe a D- because it's almost useless information.
You ignore the most important aspect of performance. Efficiency is arguably
the most important aspect of performance.
1M pps at 20% cpu usage is much better
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 4:28 PM, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net
freebsd-net@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 2:19 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé
oliv...@cochard.me wrote:
On Wed
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 2:19 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé
oliv...@cochard.me wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net
freebsd-net@freebsd.org wrote:
What's the point of all of this gobbledygook anyway? Seriously, 99% of the
world needs a driver
What's the point of all of this gobbledygook anyway? Seriously, 99% of the
world needs a driver that passes packets in the most efficient way, and every
time I look at igb and ixgbe it has another 2 heads. It's up to 8 heads, and
none of the things wrong with it have been fixed. This is now
Are you NOT SHARP ENOUGH to understand that my proposal DOESN'T USE THE NETWORK
STACK? OMFG
Julien, perhaps if people weren't so hostile towards commercial companies
providing ideas for alternative ways of doing things you'd get more input and
more help. Why would I want to help these people?
3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net
freebsd-net@freebsd.org wrote:
Frankly I'm baffled by netmap. You can easily write a loadable kernel
module that moves packets from 1 interface to another and hook in the
firewall; why would you want to bring them up into user space? It's
to be
done with netmap.
BC
On Monday, May 4, 2015 11:52 AM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Mon, 4 May 2015 15:29:13 +, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net wrote:
It's not faster than wedging into the if_input()s. It simply can't
be. Your getting packets at interrupt time
that the setkey(8) man page
documents, of all things, DES-CBC and HMAC-MD5 for a SA? That’s some kind of
sick joke, right?
This completely flies in the face of RFC 4835.
On May 4, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net
freebsd-net@freebsd.org wrote:
It's not faster than wedging
Frankly I'm baffled by netmap. You can easily write a loadable kernel module
that moves packets from 1 interface to another and hook in the firewall; why
would you want to bring them up into user space? It's 1000s of lines of
unnecessary code.
On Sunday, May 3, 2015 3:10 AM, Raimundo
.
Negative Progress is inevitable.
BC
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 9:57 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
On 8/12/2014 9:16 PM, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net wrote:
I notice that there hasn't been an update in the Intel Download Center since
July. Is there no official support for 10
It's not an either/or. Until last July there was both. Like F'ing Intel isn't
making enough money to pay someone to maintain a FreeBSD version.
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 2:24 PM, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote:
On Aug 13, 2014, at 8:24, Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net
freebsd
the reason that linux
sucks but everyone uses it? 10 years later, some old brain dead mentality.
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 2:49 PM, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com
wrote:
Barney Cordoba via freebsd-net wrote this message on Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:24
-0700:
Ok. It was a lot more
I notice that there hasn't been an update in the Intel Download Center since
July. Is there no official support for 10?
We liked to use the intel stuff as an alternative to the latest freebsd code,
but it doesnt compile.
BC
___
Didn't read down far enough. There are def issues and gains are probably
mostly in a lab with 9k frames. Turn it off. CPUs and buses are fast.
BC
On Sep 10, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
On 9/10/2013 6:42 PM, Barney Cordoba wrote:
NFS has been broken since Day 1
NFS has been broken since Day 1, so lets not come to conclusions about anything
as it relates to NFS.
BC
From: Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net
To: Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca
Cc: FreeBSD Net n...@freebsd.org; David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Sent:
maintained.
BC
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org; Alan Somers asom...@freebsd.org;
n...@freebsd.org n...@freebsd.org; Jack F Vogel j...@freebsd.org; Justin
T. Gibbs gi...@freebsd.org
is to not run PCIe2 if you need pcie3. You
can use it internally if you have
control of all of the machines. When I modify a driver the first thing that I
do is rip it out.
BC
From: Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc
May I express my glee and astonishment that you're debating the use of
complicated hash functions
for something that's likely to have from 2-8 slots?
Also, the *most* important thing is distribution with realistic data. The goal
should be to use the
most trivial function that gives the most
And another thing; the use of modulo is very expensive when the number of ports
used in LAGG is *usually* a power of 2. foo(SLOTS-1) is a lot faster than
(foo%SLOTS).
if (SLOTS == 2 || SLOTS == 4 || SLOTS == 8)
hash = hash(SLOTS-1);
else
hash = hash % SLOTS;
is more than twice as fast
That's way too high. Your base rx requirement is
Ports * queues * rxd
With a quad card you shouldn't be using more than 2 queues, so your requirement
with 5 ports is 10,240 just for the receive setup. If you're using 4 queues that
number doubles, which would make 25,600 not enough.
Note that
this discussion
before; lots of people
have round robin dual homing without any ill effects. It's just not an issue.
BC
From: T.C. Gubatayao tgubata...@barracuda.com
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com; Luigi Rizzo
ri...@iet.unipi.it; Alan Somers asom
From: Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org
To: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Cc: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com; Luigi Rizzo
ri...@iet.unipi.it; freebsd-net@freebsd.org freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 2:19 PM
Subject: Re
From: Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Adrian Chadd
adr...@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: it's the output, not ack coalescing (Re
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it; Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.org;
FreeBSD Net n...@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: it's the output
Great. Never has the been a better explanation for the word Kludge than netmap.
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
To: Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com
Cc: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com; FreeBSD Net n...@freebsd.org;
Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it
.
BC
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: it's the output, not ack coalescing (Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux
Criticism is the bedrock of innovation.
From: Vijay Singh vijju.si...@gmail.com
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 3:46 PM
Subject: Re
Horsehockey. What are you guys running with, P4s?
Modern cpus are magnificently fast. The triviality of lookups is a non-issue
in almost all cases. The ability of modern cpus to fill a transmit queue faster
than the data can be transmitted is incontrovertible.
With TCP you have windows and
EFFICIENCY is tantamount. Throughput is almost always a tuning issue.
Of course I meant paramount. Coffee matters :-|
From: Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it
To: Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.org
Cc: FreeBSD Net n...@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 14,
You can create your own pipeline with some minor modifications. Why wait months
for the guys who did it wrong to make changes?
BC
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com; Freddie
The stock igb driver binds to all cores, so with multiple igbs you have multiple
nics binding to the same cores. I suppose that might create issues in a lagg
setup.
Try 1 queue and/or comment out the bind code.
BC
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com
To:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Barney Cordoba
barney_cord...@yahoo.com wrote about Re: Recommendations for 10gbps NIC:
BC I don't really understand why nearly all 10GBE cards are dual-port.
BC Surely there is a market for NICs between 1 gigabit and 20 gigabit.
Myricom has single port
From: Sean Bruno sean_br...@yahoo.com
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: bce(4) panics, 9.2rc1 [redux]
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 14:07 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
Running 9.2 in production load
From: Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it
To: Alexander V. Chernikov melif...@freebsd.org
Cc: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com; Daniel Feenberg
feenb...@nber.org; freebsd-net@freebsd.org freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 4:15 AM
From: Alexander V. Chernikov melif...@freebsd.org
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Daniel Feenberg
feenb...@nber.org
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 4:02 AM
Subject: Re: Recommendations
From: Alexander V. Chernikov melif...@freebsd.org
To: Boris Kochergin sp...@acm.poly.edu
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: Recommendations for 10gbps NIC
On 25.07.2013 00:26, Boris Kochergin wrote:
Hi.
Hello.
From: Daniel Feenberg feenb...@nber.org
To: Alexander V. Chernikov melif...@freebsd.org
Cc: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: Recommendations for 10gbps
On Sat, 7/20/13, isp ml...@ukr.net wrote:
Subject: LACP LAGG device problems
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Saturday, July 20, 2013, 10:04 AM
Hi! Can anybody tell me, is there any plans to improve
LAGG(802.3ad)
device driver in
I wasn't referring to science projects. Nor did I say it wasn't useful.
Only that 10g is cheap now and quite a bit better. LAGG isn't perfect.
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; isp ml
On Tue, 7/16/13, Eugene Grosbein eu...@grosbein.net wrote:
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router problems
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, July 16, 2013, 1:10 AM
On 15.07.2013 22:04, Barney Cordoba
On Sun, 7/14/13, Eugene Grosbein eu...@grosbein.net wrote:
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router problems
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: isp ml...@ukr.net, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Sunday, July 14, 2013, 1:17 PM
On 14.07.2013 23:14
On Sun, 7/14/13, Eugene Grosbein eu...@grosbein.net wrote:
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router problems
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, isp ml...@ukr.net
Date: Sunday, July 14, 2013, 1:17 PM
On 14.07.2013 23:14
So why not get a real 10gb/s card? RJ45 10gig is here,
and it works a lot better than LAGG.
If you want to get more than 1Gb/s on a single connection,
you'd need to use roundrobin, which will alternate packets
without concern for ordering. Purists will argue against it,
but it does work and
On Mon, 7/1/13, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote:
Subject: Re: Inconsistent NIC behavior
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Date: Monday, July 1, 2013, 7:38 PM
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at
12:04 PM, Barney Cordoba barney_cord
One particular annoyance with Freebsd is that different NICs have different
dormant behavior.
For example em and igb both will show the link being active or not on boot
whether the interface
has been UPed or not, while ixgbe and bce do not.
I think it's a worthy goal to have NICs work the
--- On Thu, 6/20/13, Andre Oppermann wrote:
gt; From: Andre Oppermann
gt; Subject: Re: hw.igb.num_queues default
gt; To: quot;Eugene Grosbeinquot;
gt; Cc: quot;freebsd-net@freebsd.orgquot; , quot;Eggert, Larsquot; ,
quot;Jack Vogelquot;
gt; Date: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 10:29 AM
gt; On
--- On Tue, 5/21/13, liujie liu...@263.net wrote:
From: liujie liu...@263.net
Subject: Re: netmap bridge can tranmit big packet in line rate ?
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, May 21, 2013, 5:25 AM
Hi, Prof.Luigi RIZZO
Firstly i should thank you for netmap. I tried to send
, 2013 at 06:51:12PM
+0430, Hooman Fazaeli wrote:
On 5/21/2013 5:10 PM, Barney Cordoba wrote:
--- On Tue, 5/21/13, liujie liu...@263.net
wrote:
From: liujie liu...@263.net
Subject: Re: netmap bridge can tranmit big
packet in line rate ?
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday
else.
BC
--- On Sat, 5/11/13, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
To: Hooman Fazaeli hoomanfaza...@gmail.com
Cc: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com, Clément Hermann (nodens
--- On Fri, 5/10/13, Eugene Grosbein egrosb...@rdtc.ru wrote:
From: Eugene Grosbein egrosb...@rdtc.ru
Subject: Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Clément Hermann (nodens)
nodens2...@gmail.com
--- On Sat, 5/11/13, Hooman Fazaeli hoomanfaza...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Hooman Fazaeli hoomanfaza...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Eugene Grosbein egrosb...@rdtc.ru, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
--- On Sun, 4/28/13, Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
To: Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com
Cc: FreeBSD Net freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Clément Hermann (nodens)
nodens2
--- On Thu, 5/9/13, Eugene Grosbein egrosb...@rdtc.ru wrote:
From: Eugene Grosbein egrosb...@rdtc.ru
Subject: Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
To: Clément Hermann (nodens) nodens2...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, May 9, 2013, 10:55 AM
On
--- On Thu, 5/9/13, Eugene Grosbein egrosb...@rdtc.ru wrote:
From: Eugene Grosbein egrosb...@rdtc.ru
Subject: Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Clément Hermann (nodens) nodens2...@gmail.com,
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
--- On Tue, 4/30/13, w...@sourcearmory.com w...@sourcearmory.com wrote:
From: w...@sourcearmory.com w...@sourcearmory.com
Subject: Capture packets before kernel process
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, April 30, 2013, 11:24 AM
Hi!
I need some help, currently I'm working in a
--- On Fri, 4/26/13, Clément Hermann (nodens) nodens2...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Clément Hermann (nodens) nodens2...@gmail.com
Subject: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Friday, April 26, 2013, 7:31 AM
Hi list,
We use pf+ALTQ for
with igb on 8.3
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: FreeBSD Net freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Clément Hermann (nodens)
nodens2...@gmail.com
Date: Sunday, April 28, 2013, 1:07 PM
Try setting your queues to 1, run some tests, then try settingyour queues to 2,
then to 4... its called tuning
--- On Fri, 4/26/13, Erich Weiler wei...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
From: Erich Weiler wei...@soe.ucsc.edu
Subject: Re: pf performance?
To: Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org
Cc: Paul Tatarsky p...@soe.ucsc.edu, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Friday, April 26, 2013, 12:04 PM
But the work pf does
to recommend that
igb cards not be used for production flows, because there is little hope
that it will improve any time soon.
BC
--- On Sun, 3/31/13, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord
--- On Tue, 4/2/13, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: Nick Rogers ncrog...@gmail.com
Cc: Karim Fodil-Lemelin fodillemlinka...@gmail.com,
freebsd-net@freebsd.org freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday,
would do.
Or are you just hurling insults because you're devoid of actual ideas?
BC
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Scott Long scott4l...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Scott Long scott4l...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Nick Rogers ncrog
to play with?
I'm guessing that you have no idea.
BC--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: Pieper, Jeffrey E jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com
Cc: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com, Nick Rogers
ncrog
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: Nick Rogers ncrog...@gmail.com
Cc: Pieper, Jeffrey E jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com,
freebsd-net@freebsd.org freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Clement Hermann
--- On Thu, 3/28/13, Nick Rogers ncrog...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Nick Rogers ncrog...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com
Cc: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com, Clement Hermann (nodens)
nodens2...@gmail.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org freebsd
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Pablo Ribalta Lorenzo r...@semihalf.com wrote:
From: Pablo Ribalta Lorenzo r...@semihalf.com
Subject: vlan with modified MAC fails to communicate
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Friday, March 29, 2013, 7:53 AM
Hi there!
Lately I've been investigating an issue that
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Pieper, Jeffrey E jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com wrote:
From: Pieper, Jeffrey E jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com
Subject: RE: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com, Jack Vogel
jfvo...@gmail.com, Nick Rogers ncrog...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-net
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Pieper, Jeffrey E jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com wrote:
From: Pieper, Jeffrey E jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com
Subject: RE: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com, Jack Vogel
jfvo...@gmail.com, Nick Rogers ncrog...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-net
it needs a lot more than a patch. It needs to be completely re-thunk
--- On Fri, 3/29/13, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com, Nick Rogers
--- On Mon, 3/4/13, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: igb network lockups
To: Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com
Cc: Nick Rogers ncrog...@gmail.com, Sepherosa Ziehau
sepher...@gmail.com, Christopher D. Harrison
--- On Mon, 3/4/13, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: igb network lockups
To: Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com
Cc: Nick Rogers ncrog...@gmail.com, Sepherosa Ziehau
sepher...@gmail.com, Christopher D. Harrison
--- On Mon, 2/25/13, Christopher D. Harrison harri...@biostat.wisc.edu wrote:
From: Christopher D. Harrison harri...@biostat.wisc.edu
Subject: Re: igb network lockups
To: Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Monday, February 25, 2013, 1:38 PM
Sure,
The problem
--- On Fri, 1/18/13, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it
Date: Friday, January
--- On Fri, 1/18/13, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Cc: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com, Adrian Chadd
adr...@freebsd.org, Luigi Rizzo ri
--- On Thu, 1/17/13, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday
--- On Thu, 1/17/13, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday
--- On Thu, 1/17/13, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
To: Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it
Cc: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday
the problem i was actually seeing are slightly different,
namely:
- once the driver lags behind, it does not have a chance to
recover
even if there are CPU cycles available, because both
interrupt
rate and packets per interrupt are capped.
- much worse, once the input stream stops,
--- On Wed, 1/16/13, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
From: Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it
Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2013, 9:55 PM
On Wed, Jan
--- On Tue, 1/15/13, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
From: Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it
Subject: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()
To: h...@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Cc: Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com
Date: Tuesday, January 15,
08:29:51 -0800
Mark Atkinson atkin...@gmail.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2013 18:25, Barney Cordoba wrote:
I have a situation where I have to run 9.1 on an
old single core
box. Does anyone have a handle on whether it's
better to build
--- On Wed, 1/9/13, Erich Dollansky erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com wrote:
From: Erich Dollansky erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com
Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Mark Atkinson atkin...@gmail.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org,
jack.vo...@gmail.com
Date
--- On Wed, 1/9/13, sth...@nethelp.no sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
From: sth...@nethelp.no sth...@nethelp.no
Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
To: erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com
Cc: barney_cord...@yahoo.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, jack.vo...@gmail.com,
atkin...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday,
--- On Tue, 1/8/13, Mark Atkinson atkin...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Mark Atkinson atkin...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, January 8, 2013, 11:29 AM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2013 18:25, Barney Cordoba
--- On Wed, 1/9/13, Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
To: Mark Atkinson atkin...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 1:08 PM
--- On Tue, 1/8/13, Mark
--- On Mon, 1/7/13, Erich Dollansky erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com wrote:
From: Erich Dollansky erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com
Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Monday, January 7, 2013, 10:56 PM
Hi,
On Mon, 7 Jan
--- On Tue, 1/8/13, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
From: Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au
Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
To: Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com
Cc: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com, Erich Dollansky
erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date
--- On Mon, 1/7/13, Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl wrote:
From: Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl
Subject: Re: kern/174851: [bxe] [patch] UDP checksum offload is wrong in bxe
driver
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com, freebsd-net
I have a situation where I have to run 9.1 on an old single core box. Does
anyone have a handle on whether it's better to build a non SMP kernel or to
just use a standard SMP build with just the one core? Thanks.
BC
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing
--- On Mon, 1/7/13, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Monday, January 7, 2013, 9:38 PM
On Jan 7, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Barney
Cordoba
--- On Fri, 1/4/13, Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl wrote:
From: Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl
Subject: Re: kern/174851: [bxe] [patch] UDP checksum offload is wrong in bxe
driver
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com, freebsd-net
--- On Mon, 12/31/12, lini...@freebsd.org lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: lini...@freebsd.org lini...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/174851: [bxe] [patch] UDP checksum offload is wrong in bxe
driver
To: lini...@freebsd.org, freebsd-b...@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Date: Monday,
--- On Mon, 12/31/12, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/174851: [bxe] [patch] UDP checksum offload is wrong in bxe
driver
To: Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com
Cc: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com, David Christensen
--- On Tue, 12/11/12, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com
Cc: Clement Hermann (nodens) nodens2...@gmail.com, Barney Cordoba
barney_cord...@yahoo.com, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Luçi
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Barney Cordoba
barney_cord...@yahoo.comwrote:
--- On Tue, 12/11/12, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org
wrote:
From: Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com
Cc: Clement
--- On Mon, 12/10/12, Clément Hermann (nodens) nodens2...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Clément Hermann (nodens) nodens2...@gmail.com
Subject: igb and ALTQ in 9.1-rc3
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Monday, December 10, 2012, 6:03 AM
Hi there,
I'm trying to install a new pf/altq router. I
--- On Thu, 12/6/12, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Latency issues with buf_ring
To: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, December 6, 2012, 1:31 PM
--- On Thu, 12/6/12, Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org wrote:
From: Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Latency issues with buf_ring
To: Andre Oppermann opperm...@networx.ch
Cc: Barney Cordoba barney_cord...@yahoo.com, Adrian Chadd
adr...@freebsd.org, John Baldwin j
--- On Tue, 12/4/12, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
From: Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au
Subject: Re: Latency issues with buf_ring
To: Andre Oppermann opperm...@networx.ch
Cc: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org, Barney Cordoba
barney_cord...@yahoo.com, John Baldwin j
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
