of SFP+ modules in 9.x, the Chelsio
card also has the benefit of supporting hot-plugging of SFP+ modules.
-Boris
On 07/24/13 16:26, Boris Kochergin wrote:
Hi.
I am looking for recommendations for a 10gbps NIC from someone who has
successfully used it on FreeBSD. It will be used on FreeBSD
9.1-R
Hi.
I am looking for recommendations for a 10gbps NIC from someone who has
successfully used it on FreeBSD. It will be used on FreeBSD 9.1-R/amd64
to capture packets. Some desired features are:
- PCIe
- LC connectors
- 10GBASE-SR
- Either single- or dual-port
- Multiqueue
Specific part
Cool. Any idea of when soon might be?
And about that list of supported SFP+ modules?
Is any Intel 10-GBASE-SR SFP+ module guaranteed to work with this card
and driver?
-Boris
On 06/09/13 22:09, Jack Vogel wrote:
There will be a driver update soon with the way it should be done, it will
be in
Thanks, but this does not work.
ix0: Intel(R) PRO/10GbE PCI-Express Network Driver, Version - 2.4.8
port 0xece0-0xecff mem
0xdf36-0xdf37,0xdf3c-0xdf3f,0xdf33c000-0xdf33 irq 45
at device 0.1 on pci6
ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 9 vectors
ix0: Unsupported SFP+ Module
ix0:
I had originally sent this to the freebsd...@mailbox.intel.com address
mentioned in the ixgbe(4) man page, but it unfortunately bounced.
I am running FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE/amd64 and have a 82598EB 10-Gigabit AF
Dual Port Network Connection controller. I've been trying to get a
working SFP+ module
Hi.
I have a FreeBSD 9.1/amd64 machine. It runs HAProxy and runs out of
various things frequently. Sometimes it's mbufs.
netstat -m:
68202/1698/69900 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
41449/1229/42678/2622144 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
41449/1175 mbuf+clusters out of packet
Additionally, can someone clarify the meaning of total vs. max for
these values?
-Boris
On 03/12/13 17:23, Paul A. Procacci wrote:
How can I increase mbufs, as they appear above, and mbuf clusters,
as they appear above?
You can modify the sysctl's associated with mbufs to suit your needs.
On 02/05/11 23:07, Jason Fesler wrote:
I'm in search of MSS clamping for FreeBSD servers; in particular, for
IPv6. I'm finding pretty much nothing (except iptables..) on the net.
Am I chasing wild geese?
pf.conf(5) mentions a max-mss option for traffic normalization.
-Boris
Hi. I noticed that ndp(8) doesn't zero-pad Ethernet addresses, which is
inconsistent with arp(8):
# ndp -an
...
2001:470:897b::1 0:30:48:b1:1b:9c em0 permanent R
# arp -an
...
? (128.238.9.201) at 00:30:48:b1:1b:9c on em0 permanent [ethernet]
As everything else I can
On 01/07/11 20:26, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 8 January 2011 03:26, Boris Kocherginsp...@acm.poly.edu wrote:
Hi. I noticed that ndp(8) doesn't zero-pad Ethernet addresses, which is
inconsistent with arp(8):
# ndp -an
...
2001:470:897b::1 0:30:48:b1:1b:9c em0 permanent
On 01/07/11 21:09, Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/07/2011 18:01, Boris Kochergin wrote:
- snprintf(hbuf, sizeof(hbuf), %x:%x:%x:%x:%x:%x,
There are numerous examples of this string in the tree. Some of them
seem like they may be correct, but many of them are obviously printing
out mac addresses
J. English wrote:
Hello All,
I've recently set up a FreeBSD 8.0 VPN server with mpd5 for people to
connect remotely. However, looking at my mpd.log shows that I'm having
problems with proxy-arp:
[B-1] IFACE: No interface to proxy arp on for 192.168.1.185
In googling for solutions, I
Boris Kochergin wrote:
J. English wrote:
Hello All,
I've recently set up a FreeBSD 8.0 VPN server with mpd5 for people to
connect remotely. However, looking at my mpd.log shows that I'm having
problems with proxy-arp:
[B-1] IFACE: No interface to proxy arp on for 192.168.1.185
Boris Kochergin wrote:
Max Laier wrote:
On Thursday 18 February 2010 18:02:55 Boris Kochergin wrote:
Ahoy. I'm seeing what appears to be erroneous interaction between CARP
and if_bridge on multiple machines with a variety of Ethernet
controllers and architectures. I've observed it on 7.2-R
Max Laier wrote:
On Thursday 18 February 2010 18:02:55 Boris Kochergin wrote:
Ahoy. I'm seeing what appears to be erroneous interaction between CARP
and if_bridge on multiple machines with a variety of Ethernet
controllers and architectures. I've observed it on 7.2-R and 8.0-R. The
test
Ahoy. I'm seeing what appears to be erroneous interaction between CARP
and if_bridge on multiple machines with a variety of Ethernet
controllers and architectures. I've observed it on 7.2-R and 8.0-R. The
test setup is simple enough:
CARP master:
FreeBSD t30 8.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD
Hi. I have an 8.0-RELEASE-p2/amd64 machine running a custom kernel
(configuration file at http://acm.poly.edu/~spawk/ACM) and I am unable
to use the NFS server module on it. After loading the nfssvc module,
attempting to load the nfsserver module fails and the following appears
in dmesg:
Feb
Got it. Thanks.
-Boris
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Ahoy. I have an 8.0-RELEASE/i386 machine (installed clean from the CD,
so no kernel/world mismatches are possible) on which I am trying to add
a tun device to a bridge:
# ifconfig tun0 create
# ifconfig bridge0 create
# ifconfig
...
tun0: flags=8010POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
Jonathan Belson wrote:
Hiya
I have a server which acts as a gateway between the internet and my
internal network. The external interface receives its IP address via
DHCP. I set up pf.conf to allow DHCP packets via ports 67/68, but I
notice that when the server boots, the DHCP exchange
Joost Mulders wrote:
Howdy,
Can you recommend a WLAN PCI card for AP use in my FreeBSD
residential gateway. I'm looking for a 802.11 a/b/g card, no need
for n yet.
Recommendations and works for me's are highly appreciated.
Thank you, Joost
___
Rui Paulo wrote:
On 7 Oct 2009, at 20:04, Boris Kochergin wrote:
The heavily-used ones exhibit the problem described at:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2009-September/022894.html
...but that's a driver, not a hardware, issue. The one in the router
at my house doesn't
Stef Walter wrote:
Boris Kochergin wrote:
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
More information: I upgraded
Boris Kochergin wrote:
Ahoy. I've got two Soekris Net5501s with Atheros 5212 cards in them,
acting as access points. They are both running 7.2-RELEASE and at
times each one has up to 30 machines associated with it. Relevant
information about them can be found at
http://acm.poly.edu/~spawk/ap
Sin wrote:
Hello,
I'm using FreeBSD 7-STABLE. I have 6 NICs as a bridged interface, one of which
is a ath0 wireless NIC. I don't understand if this acting the way it should.
If I try to dhclient on interfact ath0 I'll get the request no problems. But
if I dhclient to bridge0
Ahoy. I've got two Soekris Net5501s with Atheros 5212 cards in them,
acting as access points. They are both running 7.2-RELEASE and at times
each one has up to 30 machines associated with it. Relevant information
about them can be found at http://acm.poly.edu/~spawk/ap/;. After a few
days,
The following reply was made to PR kern/129508; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Boris Kochergin sp...@acm.poly.edu
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/129508: [panic] Kernel panic with EtherIP (may be related
to SVN commit 178025)
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:38:47 -0400
ovi freebsd wrote:
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Ingo Flaschberger i...@xip.at wrote:
Dear Kaushal,
I have two lan cards em0 and rl0 on my system. is there a way to
know on
freebsd which is onboard or pci card ?. The issue is my system is
located
at
remote
Sam Leffler wrote:
Sam Leffler wrote:
Boris Kochergin wrote:
Ahoy. I'm having trouble with multiple hostap-mode wlan
pseudo-devices. The machine is an 8-CURRENT from yesterday:
# uname -a
FreeBSD test 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Apr 7 16:54:56
UTC 2009 r...@test:/usr/obj
Ahoy. I'm having trouble with multiple hostap-mode wlan pseudo-devices.
The machine is an 8-CURRENT from yesterday:
# uname -a
FreeBSD test 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Apr 7 16:54:56 UTC
2009 r...@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
# dmesg | grep ath
ath0: Atheros 5212
Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, March 19, 2009 a las 08:44:29AM -0700, Sam Leffler escribió:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
I will try to collect a better tcpdump of the dhclient packets on the
weekend and as well figure out what kind of model the AP is;
would it be helpful to connect
Kevin wrote:
Thanks for your reply, Joe! There is nothing in either system log or Apache
log files. Apache doesn't seem to have got the requests at all. Very
strange.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Joe Mays jfm...@launchpad.win.net wrote:
I have a dedicated server running FreeBSD 7.0
The following reply was made to PR kern/129508; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Boris Kochergin sp...@acm.poly.edu
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/129508: [panic] Kernel panic with EtherIP (may be related
to SVN commit 178025)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:34:06 -0500
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:29:10PM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote:
#0 doadump () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:241
241 dumptid = curthread-td_tid;
(kgdb) where
#0 doadump () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:241
#1 0xc05583ef in boot (howto=260
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:49:06AM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote:
Ahoy. I've been using the patch for a while, and, recently, when the
load on the wireless network I needed it for has increased, I've started
getting kernel panics that I think the patch is responsible
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Eugene, I take it the fix that applies on Boris's case is the
M_BCAST|M_MCAST setting on the mbuf? I would like to test/commit this.
I see you have already got it :-)
Also, why to you add support for adding a bridge to a lagg interface?
I needed to force
Hi, list. I set up an IPv6-over-IPv4 tunnel from Hurricane Electric
using a gif(4) interface using the commands:
ifconfig gif0 tunnel [source IPv4] [destination IPv4]
ifconfig gif0 inet6 [source IPv6] [destination IPv6] prefixlen 128
route -n add -inet6 default [destination IPv6]
I'm wondering
Someone I know got a
http://www.buy.com/prod/thinkpad-11a-b-g-wireless-lan-mini-pci-express-adapter-network-adapter/q/loc/101/201992199.html
and it works well.
-Boris
Paolo Pisati wrote:
Hi,
as the subjects says i'm looking for a freebsd-supported wifi express card.
I know i should look for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jun 9 18:23:59 ... kernel: em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
Version - 6.7.3 port 0x2000-0x201f mem 0xd802-0xd803,0xd800
-0xd801 irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4
Jun 9 18:23:59 ... kernel: em0: Using MSI interrupt
Jun 9 18:23:59 ... kernel: em0:
Hi, list. We needed to replicate a gigabit SPAN port on a Cisco switch,
and, due to the fact that gigabit Ethernet hubs don't seem to exist and
that other devices that perform a similar function are costly, I've
built my own in the form of a FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE/amd64 machine. Its
motherboard
Do you know about http://ralink.rapla.net/? The RT2500-based cards
listed there are supported by the ural(4) driver. There's a discouraging
comment about using them for access points in the man page, though:
CAVEATS
The ural driver does not support automatic adaptation of the transmit
Ivan Voras wrote:
Boris Kochergin wrote:
Do you know about http://ralink.rapla.net/? The RT2500-based cards
listed there are supported by the ural(4) driver. There's a
discouraging comment about using them for access points in the man
page, though:
CAVEATS
The ural driver does
tmm wrote:
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
tmm wrote:
So, can anyone suggest how I can send a limited broadcast (on an
interface that has been initalized with an IP and a subnet)?
Use the IP_ONESBCAST option and send to the network broadcast address
for that subnet. The stack will change it into
tmm wrote:
Boris Kochergin wrote:
tmm wrote:
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
tmm wrote:
So, can anyone suggest how I can send a limited broadcast (on an
interface that has been initalized with an IP and a subnet)?
Use the IP_ONESBCAST option and send to the network broadcast
address
Hi, list. As per the comment in the if_bridge(4) man page, I'm trying to
tunnel Ethernet through IP for the purpose of having multiple 802.11
access points all feed into a concentrator, which will perform NAT.
I have the concentrator with the following setup (gif0 through gif1 are
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote:
bridge0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
1500
ether 3e:7f:e8:ef:f6:a4
inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
id 00:00:00:00:00:00
Hi. I've come across this problem but solved it with a PF rule of this
form, if that's an option for you:
pass out route-to (vlan256 169.229.126.1) from 169.229.126.9 to any
This tells PF to send all packets sent from 169.229.126.9 through the
vlan256 interface with a next-hop address of
Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
On 5/27/07, Boris Kochergin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. I got an SMC SMCWPCI-GM card the other day, which is one of these:
May 27 01:16:55 router kernel: ral0: Ralink Technology RT2661 mem
0xf400-0xf4007fff irq 10 at device 13.0 on pci0
May 27 01:16:55 router
Hi. I got an SMC SMCWPCI-GM card the other day, which is one of these:
May 27 01:16:55 router kernel: ral0: Ralink Technology RT2661 mem
0xf400-0xf4007fff irq 10 at device 13.0 on pci0
May 27 01:16:55 router kernel: ral0: MAC/BBP RT2661D, RF RT2529 (MIMO XR)
I put it into a Pentium III
49 matches
Mail list logo
