On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 07:09:02PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> I do not insist that AS pathes in kernel are good idea. If you show me an
> other way to get AS information when constructing netflow exports in kernel,
> I'd be thankful. I'd be also thankful if you describe how policy routing can
[in response to off-list mail]
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:58:44PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 01:07:58PM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > If anything, I'd be inclined to look towards his work for OpenBSD
> > and see if that could be imported int
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 01:07:58PM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote:
[..]
> His only issue with using exclusively PC equipment for handling
> routing is all those strange WAN protocols and cards for which
> hardware cards are rarely available beyond vendors like cisco or
> Juniper. That's why he
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:55:56AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Read on my previous mail pls. I'm speaking of some changes that require
> altering both FreeBSD and routing daemon. Currently I'm thinking of AS path
> only, but in future some other issues can appear. Routing daemon should be close
>
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:16:25PM -0500, James wrote:
> > > [] move IPv4 routing to its own optimized routing table structure and
>
> finally it's about time :)
I've been fielding suggestions from individuals who feel using a multi-bit
trie might be more suitable for achieving higher PP
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 02:27:57PM -0800, Richard Bejtlich wrote:
> >From what I've read elsewhere on the lists, I'm not
> seeing what I should using the new IEEE802_11_RADIO
> link type. Tcpdump is compiled --WITH_RADIOTAP:
Don't use monitor mode; it's a misnomer. Try without using monitor
mode
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 08:43:24AM +0100, Helge Oldach wrote:
> maybe someone can comment on the status of this alert? There have been
> some comments about fixing it on freebsd-net@ but I haven't seen a CVS
> log - or I just missed it.
Dealt with in andre@'s recent commit to make the TCP reassemb
Hi,
I've just merged version 2.27 of rhyolite.com's routed into the tree.
If you track -CURRENT and use the MD5 authentication feature, note that
it is no longer compatible with previous versions of FreeBSD; however it
is now compatible with the Sun Solaris and Cisco implementations.
I have adde
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 08:52:27PM +0200, Gerasimos Dimitriadis wrote:
> I have just finished a netgraph node which enables the formation of multihop ad
> hoc networks. It routes data packets according to their hardware addresses
> using a link state algorithm, namely GSR.
I'm thinking it might
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 09:22:10PM +0900, Atsushi Onoe wrote:
> > Is anybody hiding any patches for this somewhere? If so speak now... :-)
>
> I have on NetBSD tree, though it doesn't support MPI350 yet.
Excellent. I'll have a look. Using ieee802_11* seems to make using radiotap
easier...
BMS
__
Is anybody hiding any patches for this somewhere? If so speak now... :-)
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 11:46:04PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 02:21 AM 2/7/2004, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> >Apparently OpenBSD has support for the USB Prism devices now, but it has
> >not been ported over here yet.
>
> It's interesting that it's OpenBSD and not NetBSD. I'll take a look
> at t
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 08:39:40PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Any other ATM card I should consider as an internal DSL modem? Thanks!
You're likely to have better luck with an ATM25 card and an externally
attached ATM25 DSL modem.
I backported the idt(4) driver to 4.x for this reason but the
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:38:19PM -, Edward Butler wrote:
> I am looking to dump the log files from various Cisco routers on to one
> of various FreeBSD boxes we are running ( mainly FreeBSD 4.4 ) once the
> logs have been dumped to then rotate these in a similar way that other
> system logs f
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 03:27:03PM +0100, Dario Freni wrote:
> I was wondering if the standard implementation of IPoFW is planning to
> be implemented. I'm not expert on device writing, I was also looking for
I've already asked Jordan about a code drop from Apple; he's trying to get
an answer from
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 05:20:19PM -0600, Bob Van Valzah wrote:
> A port of the whole xorp world might be a better target than just the
> pim part. That wouldn't take much since it compiled easily. But it is
> a whopper--nearly 1 GB required to build.
XORP would be good as a separate port, but f
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:43:12AM -0600, Bob Van Valzah wrote:
> I'm interested in doing IPv4 multicast routing but want to avoid DVMRP.
> I see kernel support for PIM both IPv4 and IPv6. But I can't find any
> user-level process to run PIM IPv4. It seems odd that kernel support
> would be pres
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 04:02:07PM +0100, Lars Eggert wrote:
> does -current support any European USB DSL modems, and if so, which
> ones? I could get this one free with my DSL order:
> http://www.avm.de/de/Produkte/FRITZCard_DSL/FRITZ_Card_DSL_SL_USB/index.js.html
> (Sorry, page is in German.)
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 04:34:57PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> If someone can tell me how to dump 802.11 packets for the purpose of
> debugging this issue, I'd be happy to do so.
I recently committed a port of the current beta version of tcpdump. There's
a switch in the makefile, WITH_RADIOTAP
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 03:51:43PM -0600, Guy Helmer wrote:
> I want to look at memory-mapped access to the BPF device.
> This would preserve the existing network device drivers
> while reducing mbuf copies, context switches/user-kernel
> transitions, and latency. Performance ought to be
> compara
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 03:39:48PM +0100, jeremie le-hen wrote:
> Since I'm not a lucky guy, I didn't get the one working with the ath(4)
> driver (Atheros), but instead I got the one which seems to have a
> Texas Intrument chipset which is not officially supported by FreeBSD
> yet. I tried the dr
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 03:35:40PM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote:
> OK ok, if one could just see what other devices were out there it would be a
> good start I suppose.
I suggest you have a look at the WirelessLeiden and IEEE 802.11 MIBs. Some
weeks ago I reviewed these for applicability to Fre
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:16:47PM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote:
> How about snmp information display programs for FreeBSD?
I'm working on something like this. What exactly do you want to measure
or monitor?
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
ht
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 02:15:11PM -0800, afshin wrote:
> Is any source routing facility available in FreeBSD ?
I think you mean policy routing. It is on the wishlist for 5.3.
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:07:46PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, freebsd_daemon wrote:
> > Are there any suggestions for
> > 1) a USB WLAN device which is supported by 4.9 and 5.x
> See the wi manpage. I have both a Netgear MA311 and MA401, and they work
> pretty well.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:01:53PM +0100, Eric Masson wrote:
> Helge> I think the problem is that you need multicasts to exchange
> Helge> routing updates through the tunnel. If I am not mistaken that is
> Helge> supported with gif interfaces as well. Maybe you could do away
> Helge> with gif?
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 04:56:44PM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote:
> What tools are there in BSD-land that are usefull for monitoring activity on
> an AP? i.e. like dstumbler but from the LAN side? well, alright, not like
> dstumbler as it has 1) and installed piece of hardware to use and 2) di
I'm working on a hack right now. Today I added SNMP agent support to
a very slim tool called trafd, which can be used to keep statistics
on host-host traffic.
With the Radiotap stuff I've committed to the new tcpdump port this week,
it isn't too much of a stretch to extend support to trafd. The i
All,
I've just committed a new port of tcpdump 3.8.1 with David Young's
radiotap patches. On FreeBSD 5.2 I was able to get the radiotap headers
from the wi(4) driver with this. This is fairly bleeding edge so there
may be rough edges around it, play with it and let me know how you get on.
The mai
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:23:36PM +0200, Jukka A. Ukkonen wrote:
> Is there anyone writing a driver for a D-Link DWL-G520+ card
> (apparently prism54)?
I know a chap (local to me) working on such a thing:- http://wlan.kewl.org/
BMS
___
[EMA
Synopsis: NFS root configurations without dynamic protocols: dhcp, bootp, etc...
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: bms
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue 25 Nov 2003 09:18:29 PST
Responsible-Changed-Why:
See if we can get productive discussion from -net on
Synopsis: Routed does not reflect preference of Internet Router Discovery Protocol.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: bms
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue 25 Nov 2003 09:09:27 PST
Responsible-Changed-Why:
This probably wants wider discussion on -net
http
Synopsis: Won't let me use ifconfig on the interfaces after upgrade to latest OS
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: bms
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue 25 Nov 2003 08:59:20 PST
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Air this out on -net for discussion/bikeshedding.
ht
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 07:08:15AM +, falacy wrote:
> Anyone who is hooking up a slackware linux box to a freeBSD 5.1 system over
> the parallel port, skip the hand book all together and add the following
> lines to your /etc/rc.conf file,
The answer has been in the plip(4) man page all alo
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 05:15:56PM +0700, hilman firmansyah wrote:
> Is there any method for fail over routing ( not dymanic routing protocols )
> .
> 1 Corporate office connetcted via wireless fast link and adsl low speed.
> IF the wireless down , the routing move to low speed adsl.
> And when th
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:03:12PM -0500, Alex Hoff wrote:
> What is the desired behavior of a multicast(and broadcast) pkt traveling
> through a bridge? Change it to count it going in *and* out? Or is there some
> reason, that I dont know about, for the current stat counting heuristics?
The bridg
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:19:00PM -0500, Barney Wolff wrote:
> Some questions, because I'd like to be an educated voter.
>
> 1. How does multicast routing work now? Presumably something takes a
> mcast packet and sends it out to every interface behind which some host
> has indicated group membe
On the subject of hacking the network stack to output broadcast/multicast
datagrams on all appropriate interfaces:-
Who would like a switch to do this in the kernel?
Who would be happier with a userland convenience function to do it?
Who would rather roll their own?
I have a diff in the work
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:58:47AM -0500, David Gilbert wrote:
> This works on Linux ... and fails miserably on FreeBSD. I would like
> to change this behaviour to either a) replace the route with the
> interface route or b) know two routes for a destination and choose
> one.
Have you tried filte
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 07:54:40AM +0100, Oldach, Helge wrote:
> I do well understand that there is no general solution. However, FreeBSD
> is definitely behind what is available on the commercial market today. Call
> it "cheating" - but it's out there and it works. I would rather prefer to
> see
>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:29:49AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> Here you are. This was even once (about a year ago) reviewed by someone,
> but did make it into the tree, because I did not insist.
Committed with userland API and some fixups. Thanks!
BMS
Has anyone implemented NAT as a Netgraph node?
If so, how does performance compare to natd and ipnat?
Regards,
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:29:49AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> Here you are. This was even once (about a year ago) reviewed by someone,
> but did make it into the tree, because I did not insist.
Ok. The NET_RT_IFMALIST sysctl is not completely identical to the existing
NET_RT_IFLIST interface. I'
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:29:49AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> Here you are. This was even once (about a year ago) reviewed by someone,
> but did make it into the tree, because I did not insist.
I've put the userland code (and a cleaned up version of this diff) up
at http://people.freebsd.org/~bm
Hi,
The sysctl net.inet.ip.subnets_are_local doesn't appear to be referenced
anywhere anymore (in RELENG_4 or HEAD). Can it go in the bin? Or is it
there for a specific reason?
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:36:44AM +0100, Hitoshi Asaeda wrote:
> ifmcstat delievered by KAME is not sufficient?
> http://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb2.cgi/kame/kame/kame/ifmcstat/
ifmcstat only appears to report IPv6 group memberships. However, reading
its manpage prompted me to try netstat -ina -- th
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:49:40PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> I have a patch that creates a sysctl that returns the per-interface
> multicast address lists that mimics the sysctl that returns the interface
> address lists. If you can wait until tomorrow I'll send you the patch.
> This is running
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:14:59PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> I can't speak to existing code for this, but I can say I have a preference
> for having a sysctl version of the code available in the vague hopes that
> someday we can drop the setgid kmem bit from netstat...
During operation, the ke
Hi,
Pardon me if this is an FAQ or answered somewhere else.
I've had a quick skim through the man pages and the source, and can't
seem to find a means of listing which IPv4 multicast groups a host is
currently a member of.
The net.igmp.stats sysctl only seems to maintain general protocol level
s
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:16:13AM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> One easy way to test this patch is to install http_load, set your
> ephemeral port range to something in the range of 30, and have it start
> testing a host. It will quickly create TIME_WAIT sockets filling all
> ephemeral ports.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 08:42:50PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
> And of course any application that actually needs to send such a packet
> on every interface can loop through the interfaces, using the technique
> on each one, getting the reply, removing the 255.0.0.0/8 alias, and
> moving on to the
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:47:51AM -0700, sarat chandra Annadata wrote:
> I am need of some urgent techinical help to pull me out of a little problem. I have
> been
> trying to broadcast a UDP packet(actually it is a DHCP offer packet) but
> havent' successfully done it sofar. The following is t
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:41:19AM -0400, Justin Ma wrote:
> Is it possible to raise multiple loopback interfaces in 5-current?
ifconfig loN create.
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscr
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:10:56PM +0200, Mark Daniel Reidel wrote:
> Mark Daniel Reidel wrote:
>
> >ifconfig fxp0 up
>
> Just if someone is interested: The problem was this line. After changing
> it to:
>
> ifconfig fxp0 link0 up
>
> everything worked fine.
Bizarre. Why would uploading the i
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:22:34PM +0200, Peter Bozarov wrote:
> I'm using 4.7. I have three interfaces, rl0, xl0, and xl1.
Support for 4.7 is very limited as we transition to 4.9, please be
prepared to upgrade the box. Bear in mind we commit fixes for problems
to HEAD first except in those cases
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:10:47PM +0200, Peter Bozarov wrote:
> (First off, I hope I'm posting to the right list.)
-net would be more appropriate. [Redirected from -hackers]
> I have the following question regarding mbuf cluster exhaustion.
> If I've managed to exhaust the pool, I start getting
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 03:45:10PM +0200, Ivan Boule wrote:
> I would like to know which freeBSD release includes support
> for RFC2991/RFC2992 (multipath routing).
None of them do, yet. I'd like this, but there are too many other things
we have to fix first; Sam's work has to be finished, for one
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:53:08AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> Does PPPoA really need signalling? I tried to find any pointers to PPPoA
> specification, but this seems to be not easy to find.
I was probably half asleep when I wrote that answer :) it's been a stressful
week.
I should correct mysel
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:00:10AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> I think these uncommitted patches will mostly affect route.c, while this
> patch is for rtsock.c, the route(4) interface with the kernel, which is
> unlikely to change a lot.
Much-improved patch to cleanup rtsock.c at bde's prodding
Hi,
Here's a diff to eliminate the senderr() macro from rtsock.c.
This macro is masking goto statements, which is incredibly bad style,
and makes it difficult to follow the flow of control in the file.
This diff also stops rtsock.c from abusing the M_RTABLE malloc define
for routing socket messag
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:45:57PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> How often is "so often"? The vendor branch is over a year old and the
> bug that seems to annoy
> most real users of bpf has been known for quite a while longer and took
> a while to get into
> the origin and now it only would nee
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:17:59PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
> Are you talking about running the phone line directly to the fbsd box
> with no dsl modem?
Yes. Also, PPPoA in FreeBSD is currently only implemented if you use ngatm,
because of the signalling involved. RFC 1483 framing is a simple bo
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 12:43:44AM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> >Shurely you mean tcpdump 3.7.2, which is already imported (by fenner, with
> >additional hacks)?
> I mean libpcap, which also tcpdump uses, if I´m not mistaken. Look in
> contrib/libpcap
This is coming up more often. Perhaps we sh
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:55:28AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:
> 1) Any viable solution with FreeBSD for doing that kinds (PPPoA or RFC
> 1483) of encapsulation.
Using xDSL will be difficult. There is a driver I have picked up for the
Lanai chip (Efficient Networks SpeedStream 30x0 series
Hi,
It should be possible to set the link layer address of an interface whilst
also setting the IP address. Here's a revised patch for ifconfig(8) to
add this functionality (against HEAD) based on the one in the PR.
There is a problem in that applying this patch modifies syntax such that
statemen
Hi,
Based on discussion between ru@ and I, there's a patch attached which
tries to fix the problem without deleting GENMASK routes, and is
stricter about not touching STATIC routes.
Comments and reviews solicited, appreciated...
Thanks!
BMS
--- if_ether.c.orig Mon Sep 22 21:11:59 2003
+++ if
[Cc'd to -net instead as poss. OT for -current]
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 07:29:48PM -0600, Vector wrote:
> What happened to ipintrq? I know it is now defined in ip_input.c...problem
[snip]
Try using netisr_dispatch() to hand-off an mbuf to the network stack
instead. Look at the differences betwee
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:59:21PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> I just noticed that Bill committed fix to this bug back in February. Now
> it only needs that somebody refreshes the import from 0.7 to 0.7.2.
Er, if you check this URL:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/contrib/tcpdump/CHA
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:14:46AM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> Sure, but because the bug in pcap-bpf.c there is no way to set the
> buffer above 32768
> without recompiling the library after applying the patch.
>
> This bug should be fixed in the FreeBSD copy of libpcap because tcpdump
> folk
Hi Marko,
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 03:05:15PM +0200, Marko Zec wrote:
> Network stack cloning patches allow for multiple fully independent network
> stacks to simultaneously coexistst in a single FreeBSD kernel. Combined with
[snip]
Your work is most interesting. I look forward to using it as a
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 11:18:41PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> I don't believe so. We pay for a leased connection - so it's not supposed to
> be filtered. I'll have a dig around tho. One other question, is their any
> way to statically map an IP to a MAC (user who keeps chainging their IP when
> t
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 10:03:27AM +0200, jakae wrote:
> I have a freebsd box which is connected to two different networks
> (public and private). I would like to give to somebody a shell account
> on this box, but allow him just to see, trace,.. the public network. The
> best would be if he co
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 06:39:12PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> / 33104 broadcast/multicast datagrams dropped due to no socket " which seems an
> inordinatly high amount. There are no drops due to full socket buffers, although I
> have recompiled the kernel with nmbclusters=8192 and Maxusers=10
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:54:12AM +0200, Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> [snipped]
> gre0: flags=b051 mtu 1476
> inet 192.168.1.1 --> 192.168.2.1 netmask 0xff00
> inet6 fe80::2c0:26ff:fea3:5df6%gre0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
>
>
> Besides, I think that every interface already
Hi all,
Could someone review my PR and let me know if they have also observed
the problem? I will produce a fix shortly.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=56341
Thanks
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
[Redirected to -net as more appropriate]
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 03:06:16PM -0700, Jerry Toung wrote:
> BMS,
> please be patient. I guess I am still a little bit confuse as to how a
> packet goes from a real NIC (i.e xl0) to the gre pseudo-device.
No problem. :-)
> in if_gre.c, you define a new
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 03:43:33PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FreeBSD ought to add per-socket socket options to
> allow a programmer to turn on and off the don't
> fragment bit for UDP and the UDP checksum, on a per
> socket basis.
Why? Sure, it would be easy enough to do, but why exactly
Further searching turned up a post on the Quagga-users list which suggested
TTL might be the culprit.
I bounce the interface using ifconfig to recreate the interface route
in the routing table, then throw tcpdump extra options to monitor MTU,
as well as running route -nv monitor in the background:
Hi all,
First of all apologies for the length of this mail - it is quite voluminous
as I'm trying to pack in all required information.
I don't seem to be able to achieve an end-to-end path between my Cisco
2520 and my laptop running FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE using the GRE tunneling
protocol. Before I d
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:17:16AM -0500, Khoa A. To wrote:
> I need to get a translation of MAC addresses to IP addresses in the kernel.
> I saw some postings about how to translate MAC to IP in the user level, but
> they seem to require the host to send a packet to that MAC address and some
> oth
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 07:30:18PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> I probably wouldn't need to bind sockets to each interface if I were doing
> purely broadcast traffic. I'm happy with what works for the time being,
> however; I may revisit this if I ever implement IPv6 sup
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 06:18:57AM -0700, Bill Fenner wrote:
> I think c) (perhaps combined with IP_RECVDSTADDR so that you know
> whether you got a unicast or broadcast) is the correct answer.
> I think binding UDP sockets to tell what interface/address was
> the destination is a historical artifa
Hi all,
Ok, the broadcast sending problem is solved, as far as I'm concerned.
However, the reception problem isn't:
14766 broadcast/multicast datagrams dropped due to no socket
This despite:
wi0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
inet 1.234.56.78 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 1.255.255.255
udp4
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:35:03PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> Your change makes it so that broadcasts sent to 255.255.255.255 will
> be transmitted on all interfaces marked with a ONES_BCAST flag, right?
It really is a very simple addition.
It's a protocol-level socket option, so doesn't interfe
Hi all,
Does anyone have any major objections to an MFC'ing of IP_ONESBCAST which I
committed yesterday before the upcoming 4.9 code freeze next Monday?
If you could let me know before, say, Saturday PM BST, that would be great.
Regards
BMS
___
[EMAIL
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 03:59:27PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> this note is to insure "everyone" is aware. If your are actively working
> on stuff related to the network code and I haven't already corresponded
> with you; please let me know so we can coordinate our work--I have no
> interest in
Oops. Resend.
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 04:52:38PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > I have actually managed to panic the 5.1 kernel by passing a wrongly
> > formatted routing message in.
> I'd be interested in the code that panics the kernel. (To fix
> the latter.)
Attached. D
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:51:18PM -0400, Michael W. Oliver wrote:
> I am looking for a USB Bluetooth adapter for my -CURRENT machine and would
> like to know what works and doesn't work for you. Please reply directly to
> me if you feel this is OT.
The little MSI ones appear to work A-OK.
BMS
Bill,
Thanks for your help the other week. It seems, though, that in order to
fix my code, I had to replicate exactly what route(8) did.
Specifically, it fills out the netmask sockaddr_in in this way: it counts
the number of bytes of netmask set within the sockaddr and sets sin_len
accordingly.
Good news, I have acquired IP-over-DVB hardware, dish and LNB.
Bad news, the Adaptec (pre-Broadlogic) ABA-1040 is ancient, and would
appear to have *nothing* in the way of available documentation, or drivers;
unless anyone can help... ?
Regards
BMS
___
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:14:12AM -0400, michael rabinovich wrote:
> Does anyone know the status of T/TCP support on FreeBSD 4.7?
...
> Am I missing something (after all, FreeBSD is supposed to be a ref
> implementation of T/TCP!) and if not is there is a simple way around
> this problem, short
emand using a routing protocol
* such as AODV.
* This code will probably be vastly cleaned up and tested more thoroughly
* before being used as the basis for a user-space BSD AODV implementation.
*/
/*
* Copyright (c) 2003 Bruce M. Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* All rights reserved.
*
*
Hi all,
I send you this patch in order that I may have your advice. I've added
a module to tcpdump to decode AODV packets as per RFC 3561.
The only extension currently understood is HELLO.
I've submitted this to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I've been working with
a number of you on wi(4) related things
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:51:28PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> RTF_XRESOLVE is set when the target of the newly cloned route is not
> known by the kernel and must be set up by a user process. I'm not
> sure if anything ever used this, although I guess it could be used to
> implement ISIS.
I h
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:45:28PM +0200, Vincent Jardin wrote:
> I do not understand the purpose of the flag PRCLONING. What is it for ?
Compare the output of netstat -rn with netstat -rna, to see the
difference between a cloned and a protocol-cloned route.
BMS
__
I noticed that if I do this:-
# route add -net 224.0.0.0/4 -iface xl0 -expire 3000
The resultant cloned routes don't get given a lifetime, i.e. they're
totally static and remain in the route table for the lifetime of the kernel.
Either multicast designated receivers or IGMP aware routers are the
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:13:03AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Cool! Hopefully this work will include fixing lucent cards too :-)
Hail Eris. All hail Discordia.
By the way, have you seen RFC 3561? It's just out.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3561.html
Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Ro
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 12:33:32PM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> permit. Certain hardware even has multiple, prioritized
> transmit rings, but there is no support for them in our
> drivers (basically we don't have an API for that).
One example which immediately springs to mind is the RTL8139C+ which
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 09:33:11PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> would you please spend a bit of your time to review
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/54151
> [patch to add -i option to arp(8)]?
I think this sort of thing is badly needed, especially for the
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 05:42:00AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> what is DVB?
> Digital Video Bus?
DVB stands for Digital Video Broadcasting. It is a standard for broadcasting
multiplexed data/audio/video content, typically over a satellite, cable
or terrestrial transmission medium. More informa
501 - 600 of 613 matches
Mail list logo
