fds by yourself including open/close.
In my eyes:
1. is the quick method, and there is no modifications in your logic.
2. Needs you to maintain the reserved consecutive fields for fd by yourself,
which increased the complexity of your logic.
Thanks
Hongjiang Zhang
From: 盛慧华 [mailto:hhsh
Why do you need to map TCP fd to FILE?
It is difficult to modify FILE structure. If it is possible, let us figure out
some new designs to meet your requirement.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of ???
Sent: Thursday
Please check whether LRO is enabled on your FreeBSD server with "ifconfig".
Linux default enables GRO (see the output of 'ethtool -k eth0'), which covers
LRO optimization.
Thanks
Hongjiang Zhang
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [
Did you enable LRO on FreeBSD side (check 'ifconfig' output)? Linux default
enables GRO (see the output of 'ethtool -k eth0').
Thanks
Hongjiang Zhang
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of
you please share the plan for LRO improvement?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: hiren panchasara [mailto:hi...@strugglingcoder.info]
Sent: 2016年1月11日 23:43
To: Hongjiang Zhang
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is there any plan to support GRO
On 01/11/16 at 11:19P, Hongjiang
Hi all,
LRO has been enabled since FreeBSD 7.1. Is there any plan to support GRO
(Generic Receive Offloading)?
I also found Linux disabled LRO and enabled GRO by default. It looks like GRO
is better than LRO.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
h
I can observe the same phenomena on FreeBSD 10.2:
current+cache==total==USED+FREE.
There must be some relationship between them.
$ netstat -mb|grep "mbuf clusters"
0/766/766/126146 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
$ vmstat -z|egrep "mbuf_cluster|ITEM"|column -t
ITEM SIZE
[mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: 2015年11月23日 23:31
To: Hongjiang Zhang
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is it allowed to copy hyper-v drivers from FreeBSD 10 and packed
it into FreeBSD 9.2
On 22 November 2015 at 21:58, Hongjiang Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some people, who used FreeBSD 9.2
Hi,
Some people, who used FreeBSD 9.2 and back-port network driver for Hyper-v from
FreeBSD 10, encountered a network issue. They installed 2 VM (FreeBSD 9.2 with
the customized FreeBSD kernel) on Azure. Network went offline very soon when
the big file (~320M byte) is copied from one VM to anth
