7;ve heard that someone is making the improvements that allow
the jail to hold multiple IP addresses. Maybe you can take a look at my
suggestions? Thanks.
MQ
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
2007/4/24, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
I'm trying to get two gigabit network cards to work together.
em0: port
0x1000-0x101f mem 0xf050-0xf051,0xf0524000-0xf0524fff irq 19 at
device 25.0 on pci0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:25:0: class=0x02 card=0x2800103c chip=0x104a8086 re
2007/2/6, Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, MQ wrote:
> 2006/12/14, Oleg Bulyzhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:55:51AM +, MQ wrote:
>> > 2006/12/12, Oleg Bulyzhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > >
2006/12/14, Oleg Bulyzhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:55:51AM +0000, MQ wrote:
> 2006/12/12, Oleg Bulyzhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 11:54:01AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> >> Forwarding to net@ list and to Ole
2007/1/28, MQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/1/27, Wishmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello MQ,
>
> Saturday, January 27, 2007, 5:31:49 PM, you wrote:
>
> M> I have two boxes with onboard bge, one using 5780, the other
> M> 5701. Neither of them has your
2007/1/27, Wishmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello MQ,
Saturday, January 27, 2007, 5:31:49 PM, you wrote:
M> I have two boxes with onboard bge, one using 5780, the other
M> 5701. Neither of them has your problem. I think there may be some
M> problems with your software or hardwar
2007/1/25, Wishmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello Jeff,
Monday, January 22, 2007, 4:39:28 PM, you wrote:
JR> I have been unable to produce time outs with my current setup in
JR> 6.2-Release.
JR> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x81491043 chip=0x165914e4
rev=0x11
JR> hdr=0x00
JR>
2007/1/22, Wishmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello LI,
Sunday, January 21, 2007, 12:52:55 AM, you wrote:
LX> Wishmaster wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/92090
LX> Have you tried this one?
LX> http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/patch-bge-releng62
LX> Che
2006/12/12, Oleg Bulyzhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 11:54:01AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Forwarding to net@ list and to Oleg, who has made polling
> support for bge(4).
>
> - Forwarded message from MQ < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Fro
2006/11/29, Vladimir Terziev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The cable and the switch port, both were one and the same in the
test with Broadcom NIC and in the test with D-Link NIC. So, the reason is
not in them for sure.
I didn't mention in my initial e-mail, that since the swtich is
100
2006/11/10, Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, MQ wrote:
> 2006/11/5, Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Brooks Davis wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:46:30AM +, MQ wrote:
>> >> 2006
2006/11/5, Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:46:30AM +, MQ wrote:
>> 2006/11/3, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> The particular definition used is excedingly ugly. At a minimum there
2006/11/8, LI Xin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
MQ wrote:
[snip]
> The mailing list denied all the mail from my previous mail box provided
by
> Netease(NASDAQ: NTES) from China mainland, even I subscribed to -net,
and
> asked me to wait the moderator's approval. But after I cha
2006/11/7, Marat N.Afanasyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
> > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
>
> Ok, I also have a machine with bge(4) NIC within reach.
> I've had a look at it for similar symptoms (see below).
>
> > bge0 1500 00:50:45:5f:4f:78 23410
2006/11/6, Senandung Mendonan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi David / list,
Just to drop a note that this situation still persists, even with the
latest 6.2-BETA3. I have issued a pr. In addition, I'm willing to send
you (or anyone in the list) the NIC in question for troubleshooting.
Would very much
2006/11/6, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Spadge wrote:
> Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> Am I the only person who's tired of all of the spam on this mailing
list?
>> Why is this mailing list not set up so that only subscribers to the
list
>> can post to it? This has been sta
2006/11/5, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:46:30AM +0000, MQ wrote:
> 2006/11/3, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:46:47AM +, MQ wrote:
> >> 2006/11/2, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I have two boxes running bge(4). One is ARIMA SW330 with two 5780 on board,
another is HP NC6000 notebook with 5701. After I enabled device polling, I
found the lost_polls is always increasing. I looked through the codes in
/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c, and finally found that the problem lies in the
I use google mail web interface to post messages, I can't connect to the
google mail POP server because someone disabled it on the firewall :(
I don't know if this post will be better?
2006/11/3, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello "MQ",
your email client is serio
2006/11/3, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:46:47AM +0000, MQ wrote:
> 2006/11/2, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:26:27AM +, . wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am c
2006/11/2, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thursday 02 November 2006 11:32, LI Xin wrote:
> VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 06:19:43PM +0800, LI Xin wrote:
> > [.]
> >
> >> Sounds like a workaround to me and in theory that is insufficient
> >> for a MPSAFE protection.
2006/11/2, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:26:27AM +, . wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am confused by the use of inet_ntoa function in the kernel.
>
> The function inet_ntoa in the /sys/libkern/inet_ntoa.c uses a static
array
> static char buf[4 * sizeof "123"];
> to store t
2006/11/2, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thursday 02 November 2006 09:26, . wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am confused by the use of inet_ntoa function in the kernel.
>
> The function inet_ntoa in the /sys/libkern/inet_ntoa.c uses a static
> array static char buf[4 * sizeof "123"];
> to store the result
23 matches
Mail list logo
