On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote:
> Just for giggles, what kind of money are we talking here? I might be
> able to liberate funds for work that improves network performance in
> the high end.
that'd be cool, and i wish i could as well. with the non-profit status of
the
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > What's difference (*currently*) beetwen FreeBSD+Zebra and Cisco routers?
> Support for VRRP? Support for various other routing protocols
> not covered by zebra/quagga -- at least not yet, if ever? Support
> for line cards and other devices that d
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Orville R. Weyrich_Jr wrote:
> I checked the Apache Web site and found an article from 1998 that said
> that RSA had a patent on encryption needed for SSL in the USA.
> Somewhere I recall hearing that the patent had expired. Is this true?
I believe it expired in 2000,
http://
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Shawn Ramsey wrote:
> I don't know offhand, it connects to another company, as its our internet
> connection. We will contact them and see if they can tell us what the stats
> (if any, I believe its a Cisco). The card is forced to 100BT/FD on our end,
> and im sure it is on the
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Shawn Ramsey wrote:
> > netstat -I xl0 -w 1
>input (xl0) output
> packets errs bytespackets errs bytes colls
> 6918228525822 5631 02770466 0
> 7317219262852 6041 02696855
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Shaun Jurrens wrote:
> I hate to say it, but I've had these for months starting at 4.6-stable
> and continuing up to at least the latest 4.7-RRELEASE-p* . I have one
> dual -current box that has exibited the same behaviour as well.
FWIW, I had similar issues (similar messages,
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Wes Peters wrote:
> Yup, mac address filtering is even less useful than WEP. At least WEP
> takes *some* effort to crack. ;^)
It all takes ``some'' effort. That's the point, sort of like car
alarms that are easily bypassed... The burgler will usually choose to hit
the car p
(I removed the -questions CC, looks like this is moving to -net...)
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Aaron Daubman wrote:
> >From my experiences, I cannot get my PowerBook to connect to my FreeBSD
> 4-Stable (built 2 nights ago) HostAP, WinXP clients work fine.
I've only had experience with a couple APs in
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> in the office I'm sitting behind MS proxy or isa. For windows I have
> some proxy-client setup.
> Is it possible for Unix to get across MS proxy or isa?
> Where can I get information?
ISA is a big piece of software, with a lot of features that can be
di
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, CHOI Junho wrote:
> Final: What is a good math for calculating these values safely?
> kern.ipc.nmbclusters
> kern.ipc.nsfbufs
FWIW, The math you want should be in tuning(7).
-m
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> I'm trying to deploy a transparent proxy server for a friend's office but have
> run into a couple of snags that I can't seam to find the correct answer for.
a) Draw a diagram,
b) Check IPFW rules (tcpdump is your friend),
c) Check out transproxy...
I've got a client wanting to establish IPSEC tunnel / VPN between two
offices. One end running FreeBSD/IPSEC (KAME), the other end Linux
FreeS/WAN. The problem I'm having is most interoperability docs I've
found on the 'Net are dated back to 2000 or so - has anything changed?
This is my first ti
12 matches
Mail list logo
