On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:59 PM, pluknet wrote:
> 2009/4/29 Nikolay Denev :
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have the following problem with the new bce(4) driver on a 7.2-PRERELEASE
>> from a few days ago.
>> When I run tcpdump on the bce interface on the m
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niki Denev wrote:
>>
>> I'm currently using carp over VLANs over lagg and if works without
>> problems.
>> So I think you should have no problems running carp over vlan interfaces.
>
>
Hi Rudy,
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear NET,
>
> I have some questions!
>
> [1] vlan & carp
> I have 10.3.1.1/24 10.3.2.1/25 and a 10.3.3.129/25 as gateway IPs each in
> their own vlan.
> How do I get CARP working, or are people using another method to
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bruce M. Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like this patch will cause gratuitous ARP to be queued even when
> the interface is not IFF_UP, is this intentional?
>
> Niki Denev wrote:
>>
>> I thi
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think if_ether.c would be good, where arp_ifinit() is.
>
Here is what i've come up with (some comments after the patch) :
diff -ur /usr/src/.zfs/snapshot/orig/sys/net/if.c /usr/src/sys/net/if.c
--- /usr/src/.zfs/snapshot/or
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 May 2008 23:22:52 Niki Denev wrote:
>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Looks good, though I'd probably move up the _INVOKE t
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks good, though I'd probably move up the _INVOKE to before the ARPs are
> sent out. Probably between twiddling the hardware and sending ARPs
> (though that needs an else-case if the interface is still down). In fact
> the
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It doesn't (and shouldn't have to). I'd simply add an
>> EVENTHANDLER_INVOKE(ifaddr_event, ifp) to if_setlladdr() - we do that for
>> INET[6] address already. Then vlan (and any other device interested in
>> LLaddress change
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 May 2008 19:31:46 Niki Denev wrote:
>> If one tries to use lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg0 interface configured
>> from rc.conf it does't work.
>> The problem is that all of the cl
If one tries to use lagg0.2 style vlans on lagg0 interface configured
from rc.conf it does't work.
The problem is that all of the cloned interfaces (lagg0 , lagg0.2, etc)
are created before any other interface configuration is done,
and in this case lagg0 is created, then lagg0.2 is created.
But be
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Matthias Apitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El día Saturday, May 10, 2008 a las 12:49:02AM +1000, Ian Smith escribió:
>
>> > Stevens explains further more that client and server could handshake to
>> > omit the constant flag (7e) and adress field (ff) and reduce
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the practical use of this feature? If you don't have the
> module loaded, the rc scripts won't even see the interface unless
> you manually set network_interfaces which has been documented as a
> deprecated conf
Hi,
I've noticed that autoloading of if_vlan.ko on vlan creation does not work
in the case when the vlans are specified with the interface name. i.e. :
fxp0.5
And the problem is that ifmaybeload() in ifconfig.c expects that all
interfaces
are in the format : if_${driver}${number}, which is not the
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Ingo Flaschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Bareney,
>
> >> And back to 1x is not fast enough:
> >> There are no 1gbit single port network cards that
> >> support more than 1
> >> lane, even if you plug it into a 16 lane slot.
> >> (and I'm not talking about
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Andrew Snow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can confirm that FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 can route packets at 1gbps. I used a
> late-model Supermicro Xeon server which has two gigabit NICs on a
> PCI-express "4x" lane.
>
> With the new em driver improvements in 7 it uses very
On Feb 20, 2008 12:16 AM, Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have two network interfaces that share the same IP address. I would
> like tochange the default route's interface when the link changes. I
> think it could be possible to hack up something with devd(8) or
> net/i
On Jan 21, 2008 11:26 PM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2008 11:42 AM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using the pf_flags rc var to set macros for pf.conf files i use in
> > redundant router configur
On Jan 31, 2008 7:19 AM, Bruce M. Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bigger issue w/tcp-md5 is getting security policy 'right'.
> bz has more IPSEC hacking experience than I, so I defer to his advice in
> this area.
>
> The way the socket option was originally specified was that once it was
>
On Jan 21, 2008 11:42 AM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the pf_flags rc var to set macros for pf.conf files i use in
> redundant router configuration.
> This way i can have exactly the same pf.conf on all of the routers,
> and still s
Hi,
I'm using the pf_flags rc var to set macros for pf.conf files i use in
redundant router configuration.
This way i can have exactly the same pf.conf on all of the routers,
and still set host specific
options as "hostid" used by pfsync via rc.conf
The problem is that when i use "/etc/rc.d/pf rel
On Jan 14, 2008 8:35 AM, Lyle Scott III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am experimenting more to make a small captive (wifi) portal system.
>
> I would like to use pf. I have been looking into authpf and it is a pretty
> good fit for what i need... but the users won't be SSHing to get allowed.
>
>
On Jan 13, 2008 1:13 AM, Eric W. Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I have finally given up on cisco.
>
> What are folks recommendations for a machine doing full bgp routes?
>
> I think I need to get a Sangoma card; but what is the current favorite
> bgp routing software and how much RAM do
Hi,
As mentioned in the PR : http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/119542
netstat needs a little fix to print correctly host routes on bridge interfaces.
The attached patch in the PR and here fixes the problem.
Regards,
Niki
--- usr.bin/netstat/route.c.orig 2008-01-11 04:14:54.0
On Dec 17, 2007 3:23 AM, Ivo Vachkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 2007 1:24 AM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a reason that when adding member ports to a bridge stp is not
> > enabled by default on them?
>
On Dec 16, 2007 4:03 PM, Han Hwei Woo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Niki,
>
> I hope I'm understanding you correctly, but the reason you're running
> if_lag is so that failover will occur even if there is a switch failure?
>
> If you enable preempt by setting: sysctl net.inet.carp.preempt=1,
On Dec 14, 2007 12:37 PM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 2007 5:31 AM, Bruce M. Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Niki Denev wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Is this possible?
> > > I've tried ad
On Dec 14, 2007 5:31 AM, Bruce M. Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Niki Denev wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is this possible?
> > I've tried adding IFT_BRIDGE next to IFT_ETHER and IFT_L2VLAN in ip_carp.c
> > but this probably is not enough. Any id
Hello,
Is this possible?
I've tried adding IFT_BRIDGE next to IFT_ETHER and IFT_L2VLAN in ip_carp.c
but this probably is not enough. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Niki
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
T
Hi,
Is there a reason that when adding member ports to a bridge stp is not
enabled by default on them?
Wouldn't it be more intuitive to be enabled by default these days?
Regards,
Niki
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
On 10/20/07, Netan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/19/07, Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Netan wrote:
> >
> > >Hello
> > >
> > >I am using the CURRENT release. I wish to dump the kernel routing table.
> > I
> > >think there was a sysctl interface in 4.x FreeBSD release to print
2007/10/4, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Cristian KLEIN wrote:
>
> > Can anybody point me what the bottleneck of this configuration is? CPU was
> > mostly idle and PCIe 1x should carry way more. Or is the experiment perhaps
> > fundamentally flawed?
>
> A "generic" problem in your case might be
2007/10/3, Cristian KLEIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi list,
>
> A few days ago I tested whether a FreeBSD 7 box is able to handle Gigabit
> traffic. So I used a Cisco 7600 and added static routes from the router to the
> box and from the box to the router, so that some packets would loop between
> t
Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After the last patch I submitted with regarding to /etc/services,
> I was asked if I could see if I could do something about the speed
> of it. Personally I don't worry too much about it, my programs only
> access getservbyname() only once per program :-)
>
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:37:57AM +0300, Niki Denev wrote:
>>>> Andrew Thompson wrote:
>>>>> Here is a patch to add OpenBSD's trunk(4) interface, and also includes
>>>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:37:57AM +0300, Niki Denev wrote:
>>>> Andrew Thompson wrote:
>>>>> Here is a patch to add OpenBSD's trunk(4) interface, and also includes
>>>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 04:42:14PM +0300, Niki Denev wrote:
>> Andrew Thompson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is a patch to add OpenBSD's trunk(4) interface, and also includes
Andrew Thompson wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Here is a patch to add OpenBSD's trunk(4) interface, and also includes
> LACP support which came from agr(4) on NetBSD. Im interested in anyone
> who wants to test this and in particular lacp mode if you have a switch
> that supports it.
>
> http://people.fre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Niki Denev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed something very interesing while using a ural(4) usb wifi device.
>
> When i plug the usb device, and there is absolutely no network activity,
> exactly
> after five minutes th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I've noticed something very interesing while using a ural(4) usb wifi device.
When i plug the usb device, and there is absolutely no network activity, exactly
after five minutes the device deassociates from the access point.
I've put some deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Niki Denev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on one 6.1-PRERELEASE box i found that pf.conf's manual page
> mentions rtlabels :
>
[...]
Filed as PR docs/93590
- --niki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
on one 6.1-PRERELEASE box i found that pf.conf's manual page
mentions rtlabels :
routeAny address whose associated route has label
. See route(4) and route(8).
But it seems that this is OpenBSD specific
41 matches
Mail list logo
