Re: M_NOFREE removal (was Re: svn commit: r254520 - in head/sys: kern sys)

2013-08-21 Thread Peter Grehan
If there's an alternative to M_NOFREE, I'd be more than happy to use that. Set up your own (*ext_free) function and omit freeing of the mbuf itself. Make sure to properly track your mbufs to avoid leaking them. Doesn't work: there's an unconditional free of the small mbuf. That's why I us

M_NOFREE removal (was Re: svn commit: r254520 - in head/sys: kern sys)

2013-08-19 Thread Peter Grehan
Hi Andre, (moving to the more appropriate freebsd-net) I'm sorry for ambushing but this stuff has to be done. I have provided an alternative way of handling it and I'm happy to help you with your use case to make it good for you and to prevent the mbuf system from getting bloated and hackish

Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?

2004-08-17 Thread Peter Grehan
>I think this is an omission from the old days. If it >survives ``make universe'', this should probably be >committed. Gleb, do you feel like testing this with >``make universe''? FWIW, I've built/run netgraph on PPC. later, Peter. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED