Re: SFP+ on PRO/10GbE

2020-03-24 Thread Sergey Akhmatov
On 2020-03-24 11:22 PM, Dan Langille wrote: media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseSX ) status: active supported media: media autoselect media 10Gbase-SR nd6 options=23 plugged: SFP/SFP+/SFP28 10G Base-SR (LC) vendor:

Re: SFP+ on PRO/10GbE

2020-03-23 Thread Sergey Akhmatov
On 2020-03-22 8:35 PM, Dan Langille wrote: Hello Jeff, Partial success. The card is now able to use an SFP+ optic. It warns me when the optic is installed: Mar 22 16:49:45 r720-01 kernel: WARNING: Intel (R) Network Connections are quality tested using Intel (R) Ethernet Optics. Using untes

Re: need help with ipfw nat to pf nat migration

2019-04-01 Thread Sergey Akhmatov
Hello, Victor. Try using "no nat". table {8.8.8.8, . } nat pass on $ext_if from 192.168.3.0/24 to -> $(ext_if) no nat on ext_if from 192.168.3.0/24 to any nat pass on $ext_if from 192.168.0.0/16 to any -> $(ext_if) On 01/04/2019 06:34, Victor Sudakov wrote: Dear Colleagues, I'm trying t

Multicast group 224.0.0.1 membership drops when adding interface alias twice

2018-08-03 Thread Sergey Akhmatov
Hello, I've hit some strange behavior and not sure if its a bug and where it is, kernel or ifconfig. Tested on 11.1-REALESE and 11-STABLE When I add first IP to interface it automatically joins multicast group 224.0.0.1 (All hosts), for example: # ifconfig lo1 create # ifconfig lo1 inet 12

Re: oce4 promiscous mode bug and carp

2017-08-29 Thread Sergey Akhmatov
I see it was fixed in CURRENT with version update, but haven't been MFC'd yet. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=306219 BTW, there is open bug since 2015 without apparent interest to it. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204326 On 24/08/2017 22:13, Malte

[RESOLVED] Re: oce(4) promiscous mode bug(?)

2015-06-24 Thread Sergey Akhmatov
Hello, In case someone's interested: I've contacted Emulex technical support and they've confirmed promisc mode bug, it would be fixed with the next driver update. Meanwhile Emulex kindly provided me updated version, the patch is very simple: --- sys/dev/oce/oce_mbox.c.orig 2015-06-24 15:51:

Re: oce(4) promiscous mode bug(?)

2015-06-18 Thread Sergey Akhmatov
On 17/06/2015 18:04, el...@sentor.se wrote: It sounds like a promisc bug in the driver, just as you say, but just to test it some more: I see that you are running both in PPROMISC and PROMISC. What happen if you remove the PPROMISC and only let tcpdump set it's own PROMISC? I've tried bo

Re: oce(4) promiscous mode bug(?)

2015-06-17 Thread Sergey Akhmatov
Tried disabling all offloadings available, doesn't help. Sorry, in that case I don't know what it might be. Have you tried disabling "adapter intelligence"? rxcsum, txcsum, lro, etc? ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/

Re: oce(4) promiscous mode bug(?)

2015-06-17 Thread Sergey Akhmatov
I've tried 10.1-RELEASE, then 10-STABLE and finaly 11-CURRENT with the same result. Beware The driver was unusable until fixes were applied on 21st December. http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/10/sys/dev/oce/?view=log Better use a recent 10-STABLE if possible. _

oce(4) promiscous mode bug(?)

2015-06-17 Thread Sergey Akhmatov
fine under Linux with be2net driver, so It’s definitely not a hardware problem and seems like a problem with FreeBSD oce(4) driver Any suggestions? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Sergey Akhmatov ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://list