Thank you, that was it.
Am I correct to say that pfsync is not available in 5.4 but will be
available in 6.0 and/or in 5.5 ?
Thanks,
Stephane
On 4-Aug-05, at 2:15 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Stephane,
I'm having a bit of a problem running 5.4-RELEASE and carp. All the
documentation th
Hi all,
I'm having a bit of a problem running 5.4-RELEASE and carp. All the
documentation that I read (man carp and other web based sources)
indicate to simply create my carp interface as follows:
ifconfig carp0 create
However when I run this... I get the following error:
# ifconfig carp
You mention diffrent ways to fine-tune pf. I'm particularly interested in
the number of states. I have a situation where I'm running pf around 8000
states and the box seems to perform quite beautifully, I have increased the
max states to 100K to cover large peaks which can occur, however I have
a bug?
Otherwise it seems like the system is running quite well and I am very
pleased.
Thank you for your suggestion to pf,
Stephane.
From: Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stephane Raimbault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: using natd to load balance port
Hi All,
I'm currently using a freebsd box running natd to forward port 80 to several
(5) web servers on private IP's.
I have discovered that natd doesn't handle many requests/second all that
well (seem to choke at about 200 req/second (educated guess))
There are other packet filtering options o
Sysoev wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Stephane Raimbault wrote:
The servers are busier today and error 49 is comming up frequently now.
What does "netstat -n | grep 127.0.0.1 | wc -l" show ?
You should probably try
sysctl -w net.inet.ip.portrange.first=49152
sysctl -w net.inet.ip.portrange.
check for here... it's quite mysterious as several network
based apps on the server fail, yet nothing in /var/log/messages indicating a
problem.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Stephane Raimbault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Error 49, socket problem?
D
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Stephane Raimbault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Error 49, socket problem?
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:46:58 +0900
At Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:36:03 -0600,
Stephane Raimbault wrote:
>
> I doubt it's a DoS attack, ho
certain variables logged / graphed for a
better idea of what is going on.
Thanks,
Stephane.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Stephane Raimbault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Error 49, socket problem?
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:04:48 +0900
At Tue, 12 Oct 2004 1
I have some busy boxes part of a cluster which seems to occassionaly get an
Error 49 on various network based applications at the same time.
Here is from an apache proxy log
[Fri Oct 08 11:26:45 2004] [error] (49)Can't assign requested address:
proxy: HTTP: attempt to connect to 127.0.0.1:81 (12
the inet
interface on the device needs to be set after the vlan interfaces?
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Stephane.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephane Raimbault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VLAN MTU problem in 4.9 ?
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 21:29:43 +0300 (MSK)
> Setting
-RC2 it was as
well but I'm not 100% sure.
Thanks,
Stephane.
From: Michael Sierchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stephane Raimbault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VLAN MTU problem in 4.9 ?
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 15:15:03 -0800
Stephane Raimbault wrote:
So i
et to
1496. Seems to work for now.
Now, this doesn't seem all that normal. Where can I go from here to
troubleshoot this more and provide more information that might be able to
resolve this problem... if it's a problem that is...
Thanks,
Stephane.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ste
Hi,
I have the following setup on a freebsd box acting as a router for multiple
LAN's.
xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
inet 10.0.0.3 netmask 0xffc0 broadcast 10.0.0.63
inet6 fe80::260:97ff:fe07:5f4b%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
ether 00:60:97:07:5f:4b
media: Ethernet aut
14 matches
Mail list logo
