d be clear enough. Hopefully, this can save someone
some work on getting a fix into the tree.
Tom Pavel
Network Physics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: tcp_input.c
===
RCS file: /u1/Repo/FreeBSD/sys/netinet/tcp_input.
>>>>> On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Tom Pavel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, as shown in this excerpt m_mballoc() calls kmem_malloc(),
> which from its comments expects to be called at splhigh (or perhaps
> splvm?). Ultimately, my call chain leads me to
> vm_map
akes sense, and whether
the kmem_malloc(M_NOWAIT) call in m_mballoc() should be wrapped in
splvm. I assume the M_WAITOK call should not be wrapped, but I
haven't thought that one through. Any other insights about this?
Many thanks,
Tom Pavel
Network Physics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECT
>>>>> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Tom Pavel wrote:
>
> > Here is a trace to illustrate:
> >
> > 09:05:35.956066 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111
> 261
ccept seqnums "slightly" to the left of its current advertised window
(say last_ack_sent - rcv_wnd). This would save a bunch of needless
retransmits and it would clean up the control block much sooner than
letting AA timeout on retransmitting.
What collective wisdom do folks have about this?
Tom Pavel
Network Physics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
