Hello!At first, try to monitor ICMP route from B to A using traceroute when you have and don't have problem.Maybe in case of problem traffic goes throught some router which blocks packets due to doss protections\overloading. Also, you can send UDP ping from B to A usingnping --udp -g [source_port]
.
Hopefully this is the right place to send this.
Is there a reason the OFED drivers aren't in-tree? They are dual-licensed under
GPL and BSD.
Thanks,
Frank DiMitri
(hw.mlxenX.stat) for packet sizes ie
in_gt_1548.
Hopefully this is the right place to send this.
Is there a reason the OFED drivers aren't in-tree? They are dual-licensed under
GPL and BSD.
Thanks,
Frank DiMitri
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
?
Thanks in advance.
Frank
_
Firemail.de Freemail - 10 GB f�r Mails und Daten
POP3 und IMAP kostenfrei
http://www.firemail.de/
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Yonghyeon PYUN schreef op 7-4-2014 3:22:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 07:37:08PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
Frank Volf wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing watchdog timeouts with my Realtek interface card.
I'm using a fairly new system (Shuttle DS47), running FreeBSD
10-STABLE.
For this shuttle a patch
Yonghyeon PYUN schreef op 7-4-2014 10:32:
It would be even better to know your network configuration. I'm not
sure why you have to disable VLAN hardware tagging. But given that
you've disabled it, could you also try disabling VLAN hardware
checksum offloading?
Hi,
The reason that I disable
to answer the second part of your question, the disabling
of VLAN hardware checksum.
I can't get that to work, it won't enable even though the command has
been accepted.
Regards,
Frank
Script started on Mon Apr 7 20:46:33 2014
root@drawbridge:~ # ifconfig re0
re0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING
card=0x40181297 chip=0x816810ec rev=0x0c
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.'
device = 'RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller'
class = network
subclass = ethernet
Kind regards,
Frank
; if there's anything else I can provide, please
let me know. Thanks.
Forwarded Message
From: Frank Mayhar fr...@exit.com
Reply-to: fr...@exit.com
To: freebsd-mobile freebsd-mob...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-wirel...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Firmware error with iwn on 9-stable
address type? Should we allow to use any
address?
Regards,
Frank
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
Howdy -
I remember seeing posts from Broadcom about the Net Extreme II 57711 (bxe)
some time back - they had beta available a year or so ago but nothing since.
Also, anyone know if the Qlogic QLE8152 (CNA) is on the radar?
Thanks,
Frank
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 17:15:16 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
my problem, please answer. Maybe a single keyword is enough. :)
Check: Heat ? Voltages ?
( I've had a few bits of hardware die the last few weeks, it's been
hot the last few weeks here in Munich where Frank I
Hi freebsd-net,
I'm trying to run a root server using FreeBSD using four different
IP addresses. Everything works fine with one IP address, but if I
add more addresses I notice a packet loss of about 10% after some
minutes, in rare cases after three hours. Sometimes the packet loss
raises to 50%
notes to help me?
Is the problem by wireshark or the kernel implementation?
Regards
Frank
__
GRATIS für alle WEB.DE-Nutzer: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://movieflat.web.de
for wireshark?
Regards
Frank
Hi Frank,
you might want to send both wireshark trace to me and I would have a look.
If it is a bulk transfer, maybe the Ubuntu machine did not capture all
packets.
The number of dropped packets is displayed when you stop capturing.
Best regards
Michael
freebsd 8.0 is using as standard? (Reno,
Cubic,...)
Regards
Frank
_
NEU: Mit WEB.DE DSL über 1000,- ¿ sparen!
http://produkte.web.de/go/02/
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
The following reply was made to PR kern/121437; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Frank fr...@deze.org
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, fr...@deze.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/121437: [vlan] Routing to layer-2 address does not work
on VLAN interface
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 14:21:00 +0100
Just
pool.ntp.org
Isn't it better to use different entries?
server 0.pool.ntp.org
server 1.pool.ntp.org
server 2.pool.ntp.org
To be sure that the IP addresses are different.
See
http://www.pool.ntp.org/en/use.html
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available
Hello
I plan to migrate our mailhub to 7.1 but before I do it
I need infos about network :-)
The machine is an IBM X3650 that have two Broadcom
gigaethernet interfaces.
I want to use the LAGG driver in LACP mode with a Cisco switch
to connect the machine to my LAN in bonding mode
Is there any
!
Frank
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
done;
Can you provide a patch to solve the connect problem?
Is there a better solution to setup source address selection for
IPSEC tunnels?
Regards,
Frank
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available
.
If desired I could send you the complete interface and routing table.
But I believe you should be able to see the problem with my example
above.
Thanks for sour support,
Frank
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available
change -net 192.168.200.0/24 192.168.90.2
(assuming the .2 is not on your local machine).
Hm, looks fine. I thought there must be another way for address
selection. :-)
Thanks for your idea, I'll test this and report.
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers
only.
Does anybody have a better solution for source address selection? Am
I the only one with an IPSEC tunnel?
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http
chip=0x002a168c
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
I read somewhere that this chipset is supported by the new ath9k Linux
driver but, of course, I run FreeBSD.
--
Frank Mayhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 17:57 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 16:02 -0700, Duane Wessels wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Henri-Pierre Charles said:
I've tried 7.1-BETA and 8.0-CURRENT-200809 on my eeepc model 701
7.1 does not recognize ath0
I'm new to FreeBSD. Am trying to set up 6.2. Don't understand why Network
Configuration requires a domain name. I've never needed one when setting up
Windows XP networking--only had to set it to automatically acquire IP address.
For FreeBSD 6.2, I left the Domain field blank in the Network
:: prefixlen 64 eui64 autoconf
ipv6_gateway_enable=YES
rtadvd_enable=YES
rtadvd_interfaces=net0
Do you see any problems with this setup?
Regards,
Frank
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available.
___
freebsd-net
The following reply was made to PR kern/113359; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Frank Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/113359: panic sbdrop after ICMP6, packet too big
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:26:35 +0200
The bug is probably
it does not fix the bug I described in another thread (pf eates
syn packet? on
freebsd-pf@).
Regards,
Frank
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2 Aug 2007 17:13:
On Thursday 02 August 2007, Frank Behrens wrote:
The build has following problems:
- libexec/Makefile has still reference to ftp_proxy, removing that line
helped
That's in the patch, did you have a libexec/Makefile.rej?
Sorry, I
The following reply was made to PR bin/114081; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Frank Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bjoern A. Zeeb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bin/114081: [patch] ppp(8) should be able to set ethernet address
for PPPoE
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:39:10
,
Frank
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
allowed non-root user
access.
Regards,
Frank
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any
this could be used,
somebody else?
Please try the attached patch, which puts this behaviour under a sysctl.
Fine! This should work without problems. I agree with this solution, sounds
good. I'll test it
and report the result.
Regards and thanks for your support,
Frank
--
Frank Behrens
or how should I handle the tap(4) open by an user
process, when this
process does not run as root?
Regards,
Frank
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Bruce, thanks for your answer!
Bruce M. Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 9 Mar 2007 12:30:
Frank Behrens wrote:
How does tun(4) handle this? tun(4) is also set to down, when closed. It is
not set to up, when
ist is opened, but when an address is assigned by the user process
.
2. Assign the address to bridge interface (bridge0) and use this as reference
interface.
I assume 1. is the right solution, because the bridge0 does not even create
link-local
addresses. Am I right?
Regards,
Frank
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers
As nobody made a reply I will reply myself. ;-)
Frank Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 25 Jan 2007 14:09:
I have an IPv6 setup with temporary addresses (RFC3041). To switch this on I
used sysctl
net.inet6.ip6.use_tempaddr=1. The temporary address is generated and
meanwhile expired
prefixlen 64
inet6 2xxx:::0:54b:5960:: prefixlen 64 deprecated
autoconf temporary pltime 0 vltime 509995
I use FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE-200611090613.
Regards,
Frank
--
Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany
PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available
Michel Gravey wrote:
Hello all,
I've got the following message during boot (on a 6.1 release custom kernel)
WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance.
[...]
Would you please help me to find the cause of that message, to fix the
resulting degraded performance
Michel Gravey wrote:
Hi Frank,
I'm runnning a 6.1 release, installed first as 5.3 release in the past.
Your trick does fix the warning (removing debug.mpsafenet line in
loader.conf).
Since I'm using pf, does the bug you mentionned still be in the 6.1 release
(don't think so but I
- Forwarded message from Michel Gravey [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 18:16:08 +0200
From: Michel Gravey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Frank Steinborn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: question about MPSAFE network stack disabled
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Internet
of this interaction. Might there be a fix
anywhere? Or should I just bite the bullet and get a newer Intel board?
--
Frank Mayhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank
inet6 add) worked fine, though. Any hints?
Thanks, Frank
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
all
IP connectvity. If I tcpdup on any inteface (xl? or ngeth0) no traffic
is visible.
Maybe I'm overlooking the obvious, but I do not understand why it does
not work
Any help is appreciated! I'm using FreeBSD 6-STABLE.
Regards,
Frank
want SCPS (the Space Communications Protocols Specification)
software. Briefly, it fakes local TCP on either end while talking its
own protocol over the high-latency link. I don't know if there is any
open-source package available but there are certainly commercial
solutions out there.
--
Frank
Hi,
Bit of a delayed response I'm afraid - PC troubles.
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 01:28:23AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Tony Frank wrote (in [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 05:21:34PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 04:19:51PM +0200
Hi all,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 05:21:34PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 04:19:51PM +0200, Iasen Kostov wrote:
I 16:26:23.287642 0:1:2:9c:cf:e2 0:02:55:b0:90:e4 0800 60: 127.0.0.1.80
I 192.168.118.205.1046: R 0:0(0) ack 1959723009 win 0
I
I This is some kind of Win32
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 02:08:57PM +0100, Bjorn Eikeland wrote:
Any suggestions what can be causing this? (I've only got the one nic,
and use a adsl router for internett)
You might also consider increasing the queue length of your pipes when
using prioriziation--- are you seeing packets
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 09:36:46PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
Encryption is a good idea for any wireless network.
I believe bluetooth has a little more in this respect over 802.11 but
I do not know any sure statement whether by itself it is enough.
Eg you may need to run IPSec or similar
Hi there,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 09:25:41PM -0500, Tuc at the Beach House wrote:
I want to be able to set something up where I can tunnel to a
dedicated private server I have on the global internet, and route all
my traffic through it. I want it to be the default route, and once they
Hi there,
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 12:27:05AM +0100, Sjaak Nabuurs wrote:
I hoop the drawing is readable !
[... snip of drawing :) ...]
The Facts :
OS FreeBSD 5.2 (is it stable for this problem or better to use 4.x)
With 4 nic's inside
Personally I use 4.9-STABLE for my home gateway.
If you
Hi there,
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 08:56:08PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
* the office is not very big, just as big as the bluetooth signal can
reach. There are confidential information in the office, I don't want
anyone to get my data by just stopping a car in front of the office and
listen
Hi there,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:49:58PM -0600, Nicol?s de Bari Embr?z G. R. wrote:
Right now i have an tunnel with IPSEC to another FreeBSD Server the one is
on a secure network and on a different building, what i was thinking to
do, was to install a proxy on the Secure FreeBSD server
Hi,
Thank you very much!
Since, I have confirmed that it works on FreeBSD 4.8 you are welcome to
close my problem report kern/54314 as soon as the merge has been completed.
Frank
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:15:50 +0200 (CEST)
Frank Volf [EMAIL PROTECTED] said
Hideki ONO wrote:
Try my patch which I posted to freebsd-bugs last month.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2003-June/001407.html
Indeed this fixes my problem as well!
I hope it will be integrated into the CVS tree soon.
Thanks for you help.
Frank
I have a problem
:-)?
If it matters, this particular system is using FreeBSD 5.0 RELEASE.
Kind regards,
Frank
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-net in the body of the message
, I am not sure that
is the eth board, but changing it for a
better one is not expensive.
Any info advice welcome.
thanks a lot.
--
Frank Bonnet
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-net in the body of the message
Hi
would it be possible to add a date statement
in the icmp-response bandwidth limit written
in the console to better track such problem ?
Thanks a lot.
--
Frank Bonnet
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-net in the body of the message
Hi
Is there a way to net boot a brand new PC ( without O.S )
using the bootp/tftp scheme at FreeBSD 4.xx ?
as long as the network board is able to boot on LAN
TIA
--
Frank Bonnet
Systemes et Reseaux UNIX
Groupe ESIEE Paris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubs
e PC.
TIA
--
Frank Bonnet
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
ic_routes="res80"
res80=" -net 147.215.80 147.215.20.1 255.255.255.0"
but the route command give an invalid argument error message.
Thanks for any infos.
--
Frank Bonnet
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
63 matches
Mail list logo
