[Differential] D9270: Add support for user-supplied Host-Uniq tag in Netgraph PPPoE

2017-01-22 Thread julian (JulianElischer)
julian accepted this revision. julian added a comment. This revision has a positive review. as far as I can see it looks good. Same default value as before.. INLINE COMMENTS > ng_pppoe.c:952 >* Store the originator of this message so we can send >

[Differential] D9270: Add support for user-supplied Host-Uniq tag in Netgraph PPPoE

2017-01-22 Thread julian (JulianElischer)
julian added a comment. Considering how much work went into writing this and the fact that we had to get it approved by verizon (or whatever they were called at the time) its amazing that I remember almost nothing about how it works. INLINE COMMENTS > ng_pppoe.4:111 > +To set a binary Host-

[Differential] [Commented On] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes

2015-05-10 Thread julian (JulianElischer)
julian added a subscriber: julian. julian added a comment. in case I didn't point you at this before... http://p4web.freebsd.org/@md=d&cd=//depot/projects/vimage/&cdf=//depot/projects/vimage/porting_to_vimage.txt&c=win@//depot/projects/vimage/porting_to_vimage.txt?ac=22 REVISION DETAIL https:

[Differential] [Changed Subscribers] D1809: [sockbuf] Don't expose lock details when isn't needed

2015-02-11 Thread julian (JulianElischer)
julian added a subscriber: julian. julian added a comment. Is the reason here to just make the lines shorter or is there a deeper reason? (e.g. to prepare for some upcoming change) REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1809 To: davide, kmacy, np, rrs, lstewart, rwatson Cc: julian, free

[Differential] [Accepted] D1805: [sockbuf] Don't access fields directly, use accessor functions

2015-02-11 Thread julian (JulianElischer)
julian accepted this revision. julian added a reviewer: julian. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1805 To: davide, kmacy, np, lstewart, rrs, rwatson, julian Cc: emaste, freebsd-net ___ freebs

[Differential] [Commented On] D1711: Changes to the callout code to restore active semantics and also add a test-framework and test to validate thecallout code (and potentially for use by other tests)

2015-02-04 Thread julian (JulianElischer)
julian added a comment. let me see if this is correct.. I'm assuming that the reference count can not change if you hold the lock? if so then before releasing the lock, we can check if the count is 1.. if it is then we are the only person who even knows where this thing is so there can't be any

[Differential] [Changed Subscribers] D1711: Changes to the callout code to restore active semantics and also add a test-framework and test to validate thecallout code (and potentially for use by other

2015-02-04 Thread julian (JulianElischer)
julian added a subscriber: julian. julian added a comment. >>! In D1711#66, @rrs wrote: > 3) The callout_stop() on CPU 2 does what it is supposed to and sets the > cc_cancel bit to true and > return 1. This causes callout_stop() to lower the reference count which > means when llentry_free(