Re: the correct ipv6 behavior for interfaces with gif tunnel on them

2004-12-08 Thread gnn
At Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:22:10 +0100, Konstantin KABASSANOV wrote: > > [1 ] > Hello, > > I have a freebsd box with a gif tunnel configured. I observed that even if > ifconfig displays MTU 1500 for both gif and physical interface, 1300 bytes > ipv6 packets transiting on the gif interface are systema

Re: the correct ipv6 behavior for interfaces with gif tunnel on them

2004-12-08 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:22:10 +0100, > "Konstantin KABASSANOV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I have a freebsd box with a gif tunnel configured. I observed that even if > ifconfig displays MTU 1500 for both gif and physical interface, 1300 bytes > ipv6 packets transiting on the gif interface

RE: the correct ipv6 behavior for interfaces with gif tunnel on them

2004-12-09 Thread Konstantin KABASSANOV
>-Original Message- >From: JINMEI Tatuya / _–¾’BÆ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: jeudi 9 décembre 2004 05:53 >To: Konstantin KABASSANOV >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: the correct ipv6 behavior for interfaces with gif tunnel on >them > >>>>

Re: the correct ipv6 behavior for interfaces with gif tunnel on them

2004-12-09 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:53:37 +0100, > "Konstantin KABASSANOV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> Please provide more detailed network configuration. Are you talking >> about a router box forwarding packets onto gif and physical >> interfaces? > Well, this is a router box with 2 physical inte