[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2015-02-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 Garrett Cooper,425-314-3911 n...@freebsd.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2015-01-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 Garrett Cooper,425-314-3911 n...@freebsd.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 --- Comment #14 from Garrett Cooper,425-314-3911 n...@freebsd.org --- (In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #13) I haven't tested the change yet, but thanks for the reminder (I'll verify it this week). If it works, do I have Intel's

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 --- Comment #13 from Eric Joyner ricer...@gmail.com --- Has this error gone away with the code change, or did something else happen? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2014-10-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 --- Comment #12 from Eric Joyner ricer...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Garrett Cooper from comment #10) (In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #8) So it sounds like we may just need to change IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN from a fixed value of 160 to

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2014-10-17 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 --- Comment #10 from Garrett Cooper n...@freebsd.org --- (In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #8) So it sounds like we may just need to change IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN from a fixed value of 160 to something that's calculated based on the length

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2014-10-17 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 --- Comment #11 from Garrett Cooper n...@freebsd.org --- (In reply to Garrett Cooper from comment #10) ... - What architectures is this driver supported on? What I was really driving at with this question is What architectures does Intel

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2014-10-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 --- Comment #7 from Garrett Cooper n...@freebsd.org --- (In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #6) Does that mean only the sizes of struct m_hdr and struct m_pkthdr change, or do you change MSIZE as well? The size of struct m_ext and

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2014-10-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 --- Comment #8 from Eric Joyner ricer...@gmail.com --- So it sounds like we may just need to change IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN from a fixed value of 160 to something that's calculated based on the length of struct m_hdr and struct m_pkthdr combined.

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2014-10-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 --- Comment #9 from Eric Joyner ricer...@gmail.com --- You could try replacing the two lines in ixgbe.h with these: #define IXGBE_RX_COPY_HDR (sizeof(struct m_hdr) + sizeof(struct pkthdr)) #define IXGBE_RX_COPY_HDR_PADDED

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2014-10-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 Garrett Cooper n...@freebsd.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|--- |Normal ---

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2014-10-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 --- Comment #5 from Garrett Cooper n...@freebsd.org --- (In reply to Garrett Cooper from comment #4) `struct mbuf` as the observation hasn't been violated on FreeBSD CURRENT as the observation hasn't - ; the conditions for the

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2014-10-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 Garrett Cooper n...@freebsd.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2014-10-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 194314] [ixgbe] driver makes some dangerous assumptions with struct mbuf sizing with IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN

2014-10-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314 --- Comment #3 from Garrett Cooper n...@freebsd.org --- (In reply to Adrian Chadd from comment #2) Hi! Does he/Isilon have a patch to fix/address this? We don't yet. This was a recently discovered issue on a driver that isn't available