subject:"\[Bug 203922\] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low"

[Bug 203922] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low

2016-01-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203922 --- Comment #8 from Konstantin Belousov --- (In reply to White Knight from comment #7) The patch is mostly fine. I do not see a need in the casts to uint32_t in sctp_sysctl_handle_assoclist(), the normal promotion rules

[Bug 203922] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low

2016-01-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203922 Alfred Perlstein changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

[Bug 203922] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low

2016-01-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203922 White Knight changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #162281|0 |1 is

[Bug 203922] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low

2016-01-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203922 Konstantin Belousov changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 203922] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low

2016-01-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203922 --- Comment #4 from White Knight --- (In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #3) Is there another consumer of that structure than netstat? Can you suggest how to change the structure and maintain the ABI? --

[Bug 203922] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low

2016-01-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203922 --- Comment #6 from Alfred Perlstein --- The correct way would be to retain the field as-is but rename it to "_old". Then add a field with the correct width. Then when exporting the field make sure to continue to

[Bug 203922] The kern.ipc.acceptqueue limit is too low

2016-01-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203922 --- Comment #5 from Konstantin Belousov --- (In reply to White Knight from comment #4) I have no idea about any users of the structure, I am only sure that it was written with intent of keeping its ABI. The extra_padding