https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
Eric Joyner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #48 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
(In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #47)
Yep, I can not reproduce crash anymore.
Thank you!
(I'm not sure, who should close ticket, me or you).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #47 from Eric Joyner ---
(In reply to Lev A. Serebryakov from comment #44)
Lev,
Did my commit fix your issue? Every Intel driver should be fixed now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #46 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: erj
Date: Sun Oct 14 05:09:44 UTC 2018
New revision: 339354
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339354
Log:
em/igb/ix(4): Port two Tx/Rx
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #45 from Eric Joyner ---
I'll work on porting that change (and maybe another) to em/igb/ix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Hello Eugene,
Saturday, October 13, 2018, 6:35:38 PM, you wrote:
>>> erj@ just did it, try updating to r339338
>> Are you sure?
> Sorry, I missed you need an update to all of ix/em/igb.
Yep, I have problem with em and igb, as I reported in this PR. I can not
reproduce it in ix, but I'm sure it
13.10.2018 22:27, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>> erj@ just did it, try updating to r339338
> Are you sure?
Sorry, I missed you need an update to all of ix/em/igb.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello Eugene,
Saturday, October 13, 2018, 10:04:26 AM, you wrote:
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
>>
>> --- Comment #43 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
>> (In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #36)
>> Yess!
>>
>> It helps em0 to pass all my torture tests (when I
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #44 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
BTW, if_ix contains SAME problem. I can not reproduce it (I have one ix link),
but code is same and I'm sure, it has same problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
>
> --- Comment #43 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
> (In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #36)
> Yess!
>
> It helps em0 to pass all my torture tests (when I comment out this
> "optimization" twice, for lem and em). I can not test on igb
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
Lev A. Serebryakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|In Progress
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #43 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
(In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #36)
Yess!
It helps em0 to pass all my torture tests (when I comment out this
"optimization" twice, for lem and em). I can not test on igb now, but belive
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #42 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
(In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #36)
Looks like it helps.
Simple traffic with INVARIANTS works, now I'm testing IPsec configuration.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #41 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
(In reply to Lev A. Serebryakov from comment #39)
OOPS! Looks like I patched only "lem" but not "em" function!
Let's try to patch "em" too...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #40 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
One additional datapoint: when mtu=1500 on both ends, everything works for tens
of minutes, but sending part (11.2-STABLE based) shows bursts of "resends",
which is not occurs with mtu=9000 till
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #39 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
(In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #36)
Nope, commenting out "budget == 1" section in em_txrx.c (lines 556-560) doesn't
help.
Same assertion was triggered.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #38 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
(In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #36)
I can not reproduce it with mtu=1500 on both ends for 20 minutes.
I'm trying to comment out "budget == 1" case for em(8).
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #37 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
(In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #36)
Maybe. I'm using mtu 9000 in my tests…
I could try to reproduce it with standard mtu (1500).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
Eric Joyner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #36
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
--- Comment #35 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
(In reply to Lev A. Serebryakov from comment #34)
iperf3 -c -R -t 3600 -P 32
"-P 32", not "--nstreams 32", as we speak TCP, not SCTP here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231659
Lev A. Serebryakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[em][igb][softcrypto] |[em][igb] 12-ALPHA8 r339259
22 matches
Mail list logo
