On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:18:49PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
What has not been tested or considered is the situation where we have
nested VLANs. At least one individual has asked about this feature. At
the moment, I'd suggest that only Netgraph potentially deals with this
rather than the
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:18:49PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Hi,
I have tested my 802.1p input patch with vlans configured. So far so good.
It is now available from:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~bms/dump/latest-8021p.diff
/*
* If the device did not perform decapsulation of
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:18:49PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Hi,
I have tested my 802.1p input patch with vlans configured. So far so good.
It is now available from:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~bms/dump/latest-8021p.diff
/*
* If the device did not
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
Do you have any architectural reservations about nested VLANs in
the main network stack? Presently, a one-line patch can allow a
vlan(4) to attach to another vlan(4), but I haven't heard about the
behaviour of the resulting setup yet.
After looking around it seems there is
Hi,
I have tested my 802.1p input patch with vlans configured. So far so good.
It is now available from:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~bms/dump/latest-8021p.diff
This updated patch moves the 802.1q encapsulation into if_ethersubr.c,
allowing
M_VLANTAG to be passed up and down the stack for
