Re: [PATCH] netstat(1) should print CIDR prefixes

2007-02-12 Thread Bruce M Simpson
Gary Corcoran wrote: Since those 'classes' haven't meant anything for many years, and interpreting them as 'special' is just plain wrong in almost all cases these days, I think the change is the right thing to do. I've had +3. Any objections? If I hear none I will make this change in

[PATCH] netstat(1) should print CIDR prefixes

2007-02-10 Thread Bruce M Simpson
Hi, This is a POLA violating 'let's move with the times' patch that gets rid of the special treatment of classful IPv4 network prefixes in 'netstat -rn' output. Comments please! Rgards, BMS Index: route.c === RCS file:

Re: [PATCH] netstat(1) should print CIDR prefixes

2007-02-10 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:57:13PM + I heard the voice of Bruce M Simpson, and lo! it spake thus: This is a POLA violating 'let's move with the times' patch that gets rid of the special treatment of classful IPv4 network prefixes in 'netstat -rn' output. Comments please! Please!

Re: [PATCH] netstat(1) should print CIDR prefixes

2007-02-10 Thread Gary Corcoran
Bruce M Simpson wrote: Hi, This is a POLA violating 'let's move with the times' patch that gets rid of the special treatment of classful IPv4 network prefixes in 'netstat -rn' output. Comments please! Since those 'classes' haven't meant anything for many years, and interpreting them as