Hi,
I would like your comments about the following issue and proposal.
The background is as follows. The resolvconf(8) utility has been
imported some time before to handle update of /etc/resolv.conf by
using multiple RDNSS (recursive DNS server) information sources. The
possible sources ar
On Jun 15, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hi,
> ...
> My proposal is adding a string representing the information source to
> the interface id which is used for resolvconf(8). Specifically, I
> would like to propose to use the following syntax throughout
> utilities that update /etc/resolv.
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:21:15 +
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>
> Hi,
> > ...
> > My proposal is adding a string representing the information source
> > to the interface id which is used for resolvconf(8). Specifically,
> > I would like to pro
Hi,
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:21:15 +
> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" said:
bzeeb> having helped some friends running penguin OS in the past I have been
bzeeb> confronted with what OpenSuse does. Apart from a completely over
bzeeb> engineered framework they have the ability to sort entries by ifn
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote
in <6fe95ac6-ccb2-45b0-8347-ab31283ee...@lists.zabbadoz.net>:
bz> I am not entirely sure I like "slaac" or "dhcp4". I wonder if progname
bz> would be sufficient in call cases either (I could well see a "dhclient"
bz> or another "fooapp" that can handle both v4 and v6) bu
On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:19 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
> Maybe better to add default but changeable preference for each iface,
> like STP do:
> 1000Base - 20
> 100Base - 200
> PPP - 2000
>
> sources able to give IPv6 info for as we can give more preference
> (1000Base w/ IPv6 info - 19, 100 w/ v6
On Jun 16, 2011, at 5:28 AM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hi Umemoto-san, Sato-san,
> Our openresolv currently supports $interface_order with shell pattern
> matching only. What I thought was
>
> interface_order="lo lo[0-9]* *:ppp *:slaac *:dhcpv4 [a-z]*[0-9]*:*"
Hmm, indeed we do and I hadn't actually
Hi,
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:00:32 +
> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" said:
bzeeb> I can imaging ports like mpd, ... to join this scheme and by then
bzeeb> there might be different "ppp" or "dhcpv4", "dhcpv6" or even different
bzeeb> "slaac". The advantage of this one is that if I prefer dhcpv6 o
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote
in :
bz> The only thing I am only still pondering - do we want it to be
bz> "slaac" "dchpv4" or the program name? I can see advantages with both.
bz> If we go with "slaac" etc. we might need to - at least for the three or so
bz> things from base, add a table to the man
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:29:50PM -0400, jhell wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:53:17AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like your comments about the following issue and proposal.
> >
> > The background is as follows. The resolvconf(8) utility has been
> > importe
10 matches
Mail list logo
