< said:
> A proper BSD port could use something like the trick in Stevens[1] and
> keep retrying the call with a larger bufer until the length of the
> result is the same as in the previous call.
Actually, a proper BSD port would use the net.route.iflist sysctl
instead.
-GAWollman
_
> From: Garrett Wollman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> < =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > A proper BSD port could use something like the trick in
> Stevens[1] and
> > keep retrying the call with a larger bufer until the length of the
> > result is the same as i
< said:
>> Actually, a proper BSD port would use the net.route.iflist sysctl
>> instead.
> $ uname -sr
> FreeBSD 4.6-RC
> $ sysctl net.route
> sysctl: unknown oid 'net.route'
Irrelevant. sysctl(8) is not equipped to handle the contents of this
MIB branch.
> I think since the ports work agains
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> net.route.iflist has been in FreeBSD since 2.0.
I think that it needs more documentation..
by which I mean it should be referenced in more places.
I only know it exists by "accident" (saw the commit).
___
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:24:52AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 May 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > > net.route.iflist has been in FreeBSD since 2.0.
> > I think that it needs more documentation..
> > by which I mean it should be ref
