Re: ANNOUNCE: net/tcpdump Radiotap-aware port committed.

2003-12-11 Thread Guy Harris
What are the chances of Phil Wood's patches getting ported? If you mean the patches from http://public.lanl.gov/cpw/ then the chances are no greater than the chances of memory mapping being added to BPF. :-) I.e., the patches support use of Linux's memory-mapped PF_PACKET socket support; ther

Re: ANNOUNCE: net/tcpdump Radiotap-aware port committed.

2003-12-11 Thread Michael Sierchio
Petri Helenius wrote: Is there a port of libpcap? The system tcpdump seems to be out of synch with libpcap already since tcpdump has been imported once after last libpcap import. And as said before, libpcap in the system contains the bug which severely limits it´s usefulness in larger bandwidth

Re: ANNOUNCE: net/tcpdump Radiotap-aware port committed.

2003-12-11 Thread Petri Helenius
Bruce M Simpson wrote: The main motivation for committing the port was to bring in features like this without disrupting the vendor branch of tcpdump/libpcap in the FreeBSD base system. Is there a port of libpcap? The system tcpdump seems to be out of synch with libpcap already since tcpdump h

ANNOUNCE: net/tcpdump Radiotap-aware port committed.

2003-12-11 Thread Bruce M Simpson
All, I've just committed a new port of tcpdump 3.8.1 with David Young's radiotap patches. On FreeBSD 5.2 I was able to get the radiotap headers from the wi(4) driver with this. This is fairly bleeding edge so there may be rough edges around it, play with it and let me know how you get on. The mai