On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:36:50AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Robert Watson wrote:
> >
> >On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> >
> >So far I have had 0 (zero) reports of problems since this thread began.
> >Could people using uid/gid/jail rules with ipfw or pf on 7.x *please*
> >try runni
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Max Laier wrote:
So far I have had 0 (zero) reports of problems since this thread began.
Could people using uid/gid/jail rules with ipfw or pf on 7.x *please* try
running their firewalls without debug.mpsa
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Paul Allen wrote:
From Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:36:50AM -0700:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Max Laier wrote:
So far I have had 0 (zero) reports of problems since this thread began.
Could people using uid/gid/jail rules wi
>From Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:36:50AM
>-0700:
> Robert Watson wrote:
> >
> >On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> >
> >So far I have had 0 (zero) reports of problems since this thread began.
> >Could people using uid/gid/jail rules with ipfw or pf on 7.x *pl
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Max Laier wrote:
So far I have had 0 (zero) reports of problems since this thread began.
Could people using uid/gid/jail rules with ipfw or pf on 7.x *please*
try running their firewalls without debug.mpsafenet -- ignore the
witness warnings and/or d
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Max Laier wrote:
[ Excess CC-list ... testers needed!!! ]
On Tuesday 17 July 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
Dear all:
This is a reminder e-mail that, in the very near future, Giant
compatibility shims for network protocols will be removed.
<...>
The *only* remaining case
