Am 11.02.2021 um 17:36 schrieb Lutz Donnerhacke:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:27:44AM -0300, Cristian Cardoso wrote:
I would like to clarify a doubt, if someone has this scenario in the
use of CARP for the use of virtual ips in interfaces in FreeBSD.
I have an interface where I have the 10.19.254.
At that moment I already deactivated the server.
The configuration of rc.conf was the same as yours, the only
difference was that I was using a static route for my internal network
instead of the bird.
The version of FreeBSD I used for testing is 12.2-RELEASE FreeBSD
12.2-RELEASE r366954 GENERIC a
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:27:44AM -0300, Cristian Cardoso wrote:
> I would like to clarify a doubt, if someone has this scenario in the
> use of CARP for the use of virtual ips in interfaces in FreeBSD.
> I have an interface where I have the 10.19.254.2/24 network and I am
> placing the virtual IP
Hi
I would like to clarify a doubt, if someone has this scenario in the
use of CARP for the use of virtual ips in interfaces in FreeBSD.
I have an interface where I have the 10.19.254.2/24 network and I am
placing the virtual IP 10.19.254.3/32 in the CARP, this interface does
not have a default gat
On 15 Aug 2013, at 20:33, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
>
> --On 15 August 2013 17:13:15 +0200 Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>>> Hmmm, I tried that - and it leaves the interface in a 'weird' state (at
>>> least not the state I was expecting):
>>>
>>> carp0: flags=9 metric 0 mtu 1500
>>> inet 192.16
--On 15 August 2013 17:13:15 +0200 Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hmmm, I tried that - and it leaves the interface in a 'weird' state (at
least not the state I was expecting):
carp0: flags=9 metric 0 mtu 1500
inet 192.168.107.21 netmask 0xff00
nd6 options=21
Subsequently doing a 'if
On 15 Aug 2013, at 16:01, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
>
> --On 13 August 2013 15:34 +0200 Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
>
>> So, don't configure the carp interface in rc.conf, but do it in
>> /etc/rc.local, and be careful to add the address while the vhid is
--On 13 August 2013 15:34 +0200 Daniel Hartmeier
wrote:
So, don't configure the carp interface in rc.conf, but do it in
/etc/rc.local, and be careful to add the address while the vhid is not
yet configured, as in:
ifconfig carp0 create
ifconfig carp0 inet 192.168.107.21
ifc
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:11:58PM +0100, Karl Pielorz wrote:
> Is there any way from rc.conf of creating a carp interface in the
> 'down' state - i.e. INIT?
I think any interface configured with ifconfig_* in rc.conf will cause
an explicit additional "ifconfig up" c
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:21 PM, tsaregorodtsev.de...@itmh.ru
wrote:
> On 31.10.2012 16:42, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:59 AM, tsaregorodtsev.de...@itmh.ru
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I've run into a problem while add
On 31.10.2012 16:42, Ermal Luçi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:59 AM, tsaregorodtsev.de...@itmh.ru
wrote:
Hi,
I've run into a problem while adding IPv6 aliases on carp interface on
FreeBSD 8.1.
All IPv6 aliases on carp interface are unreachable from other devices but
the first IPv6 on
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Denis,
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 02:59:48PM +0600, tsaregorodtsev.de...@itmh.ru wrote:
> t> I've run into a problem while adding IPv6 aliases on carp interface on
> FreeBSD 8.1.
> t> All IPv6 aliases on c
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:59 AM, tsaregorodtsev.de...@itmh.ru
wrote:
> Hi,
> I've run into a problem while adding IPv6 aliases on carp interface on
> FreeBSD 8.1.
> All IPv6 aliases on carp interface are unreachable from other devices but
> the first IPv6 on carp
Denis,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 02:59:48PM +0600, tsaregorodtsev.de...@itmh.ru wrote:
t> I've run into a problem while adding IPv6 aliases on carp interface on
FreeBSD 8.1.
t> All IPv6 aliases on carp interface are unreachable from other devices but
the first IPv6 on carp interface
Synopsis: [carp] CARP interface destruction with ifconfig destroy causes kernel
panic
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 08:34:57 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm now working on major rewrite of
Synopsis: [carp] CARP interface renaming makes system no longer respond on the
virtual IP address
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 08:32:41 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm now working on major re
Synopsis: [carp] [patch] when preemption is enabled carp interface assumes
MASTERship immediately even with higher advbase/advskew
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: glebius
State-Changed-When: Thu Oct 13 14:03:56 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
Dup of kern/161123
h
Synopsis: [carp] [patch] when preemption is enabled carp interface assumes
MASTERship immediately even with higher advbase/advskew
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->glebius
Responsible-Changed-By: glebius
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Oct 13 14:03:27 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-
Old Synopsis: net / [carp] [patch] when preemption is enabled carp interface
assumes MASTERship immediately even with higher advbase/advskew
New Synopsis: [carp] [patch] when preemption is enabled carp interface assumes
MASTERship immediately even with higher advbase/advskew
Responsible-Changed
Old Synopsis: CARP - when preemption is enabled carp interface assumes
MASTERship immediately even with higher advbase/advskew
New Synopsis: [carp] [patch] when preemption is enabled carp interface assumes
MASTERship immediately even with higher advbase/advskew
Responsible-Changed-From-To
Thanks Patrick and Dmitry,
indeed `ifstated' and the ``running external tests''-part, sound like it will
be helpful.
/Kim
On 2011-07-20 16:19, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Le Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:18:53 +0400,
> Dmitry Banschikov a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
>>>
Le Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:18:53 +0400,
Dmitry Banschikov a écrit :
Hi,
> > is it possible to let a CARP-interface fail(-over) in the situation
> > when a certain program fails or stops working? I hope it's clear
> > enough what I have in mind. Could you give me any pointers
On 18.07.2011 18:05, Kim A. Brandt wrote:
Hello list,
is it possible to let a CARP-interface fail(-over) in the situation when
a certain program fails or stops working? I hope it's clear enough what
I have in mind. Could you give me any pointers on how this can be archived?
You can
Hello list,
is it possible to let a CARP-interface fail(-over) in the situation when a
certain program fails or stops working? I hope it's clear enough what I have in
mind. Could you give me any pointers on how this can be archived?
/Kim
org/faq/pf/carp.html#forcefail
On 2011-07-18 16:05, Kim A. Brandt wrote:
Hello list,
is it possible to let a CARP-interface fail(-over) in the situation when a
certain program fails or stops working? I hope it's clear enough what I have in
mind. Could you give me any pointers on how this can be archived?
/Kim
Old Synopsis: CARP interface destruction with ifconfig destroy causes kernel
panic
New Synopsis: [carp] CARP interface destruction with ifconfig destroy causes
kernel panic
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri
Caune" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: kern/126714: [carp] CARP interface renaming makes system no
> longer respond on the virtual IP address
> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:05:55 +0300
>
> Same for me, but when I re
The following reply was made to PR kern/126714; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Artis Caune" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/126714: [carp] CARP interface renaming makes system no longer
respond on the virtual IP address
Date:
Old Synopsis: CARP interface renaming makes system no longer respond on the
virtual IP address
New Synopsis: [carp] CARP interface renaming makes system no longer respond on
the virtual IP address
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsi
On 9/20/07, Christopher Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 September 2007, Christopher Chen wrote:
> > > Hi:
> > >
> > > I'm running 6.2-RELEASE on some Pentium D's running and amd64 port.
> > >
> > > I'm doing some mildly interesti
On 9/20/07, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 20 September 2007, Christopher Chen wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > I'm running 6.2-RELEASE on some Pentium D's running and amd64 port.
> >
> > I'm doing some mildly interesting things with vlan tagging, etc, and I
> > want to also set up carp.
On Thursday 20 September 2007, Christopher Chen wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I'm running 6.2-RELEASE on some Pentium D's running and amd64 port.
>
> I'm doing some mildly interesting things with vlan tagging, etc, and I
> want to also set up carp. On identical machines running the i386 port,
> this works corre
Hi:
I'm running 6.2-RELEASE on some Pentium D's running and amd64 port.
I'm doing some mildly interesting things with vlan tagging, etc, and I
want to also set up carp. On identical machines running the i386 port,
this works correctly, but when running
ifconfig carp0
For instance, the process j
Hi,
If you are running VMware 5.x, then you can use the em driver (Intel
Pro/1000) instead, which is far more functional than the lnc driver. To
do so:
1. Shutdown the VMware system
2. Locate the *.vmx file for your virtual machine
3. Open the *.vmx file in your favourite text
On 5/12/2006 9:48 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:30:27PM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote:
A> >If interface, that went down, had reported its state then CARP
A> >would had noticed that and would had lowered its priority,
A> >gave up mastering, and became backup. This will be redunda
Hi,
A> >If interface, that went down, had reported its state then CARP
A> >would had noticed that and would had lowered its priority,
A> >gave up mastering, and became backup. This will be redundant.
A>
A>Is it impossible to add link state reporting to lnc driver ?
A>I think this woul
t;A> those servers, but we cannot do it as the carp does not work.
A> >A>
A> >A> I don't really get it why the link state is so important here, as
A> >A> to my understanding carp works in similar as vrrp, using
A> >A> heartbeats ? Also, the current state of
se servers, but we cannot do it as the carp does not work.
A>
A> I don't really get it why the link state is so important here, as
A> to my understanding carp works in similar as vrrp, using
A> heartbeats ? Also, the current state of matters is more confusing,
A> since you can get th
ut we cannot do it as the carp does not work.
A>
A> I don't really get it why the link state is so important here, as
A> to my understanding carp works in similar as vrrp, using
A> heartbeats ? Also, the current state of matters is more confusing,
A> since you can get the
39 matches
Mail list logo
