Re: FIREWALL_FORWARD vs. using /sbin/natd ?

2002-01-18 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:19:39AM -0800, Crist J . Clark wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 09:40:23AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:25:41PM -0800, Crist J . Clark wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:56:36AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > It is also there for any

Re: FIREWALL_FORWARD vs. using /sbin/natd ?

2002-01-14 Thread Crist J . Clark
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 09:40:23AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:25:41PM -0800, Crist J . Clark wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:56:36AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > > I found a document describing a firewall design only using natd > > > for redirects to internal

Re: FIREWALL_FORWARD vs. using /sbin/natd ?

2002-01-14 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:25:41PM -0800, Crist J . Clark wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:56:36AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > I found a document describing a firewall design only using natd > > for redirects to internal network resources. (Hi Marshall, therefore > > Cc: to you, since its y

Re: FIREWALL_FORWARD vs. using /sbin/natd ?

2002-01-13 Thread Crist J . Clark
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:56:36AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > I found a document describing a firewall design only using natd > for redirects to internal network resources. (Hi Marshall, therefore > Cc: to you, since its yours and I have a question). > > http://www.rootprompt.net/freebsd

FIREWALL_FORWARD vs. using /sbin/natd ?

2002-01-13 Thread Andreas Klemm
I found a document describing a firewall design only using natd for redirects to internal network resources. (Hi Marshall, therefore Cc: to you, since its yours and I have a question). http://www.rootprompt.net/freebsd_firewall.html Based on these informations I think I could get rid of