On 12.07.2012 16:55, George Neville-Neil wrote:
On Jul 11, 2012, at 17:57 , Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On 07/11/12 14:30, g...@freebsd.org wrote:
Howdy,
Does anyone know the reason for this particular check in
ip_output.c?
if (rte != NULL && (rte->rt_flags & (RTF_UP|RTF_HOST))) {
Filed as,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=169898
Thanks for looking into this when you get time.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 04:49:23PM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 12:55 , Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:55:16AM -0400,
On 07/12/2012 01:50 PM, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 14:28 , Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> While y'all are looking at MTU (which is an increasingly important topic
>> as we move into a Gig+ world) I'm wondering what our support is for
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4821 ?? I as
On Jul 12, 2012, at 14:28 , Doug Barton wrote:
> While y'all are looking at MTU (which is an increasingly important topic
> as we move into a Gig+ world) I'm wondering what our support is for
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4821 ?? I asked this a while back and
> never got an answer.
>
> This m
On Jul 12, 2012, at 12:55 , Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:55:16AM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 11, 2012, at 17:57 , Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/11/12 14:30, g...@freebsd.org wrote:
Howdy,
Does anyone know the reason for this
While y'all are looking at MTU (which is an increasingly important topic
as we move into a Gig+ world) I'm wondering what our support is for
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4821 ?? I asked this a while back and
never got an answer.
This method of PMTUD is really important given the massive (stupid)
On Jul 12, 2012, at 12:55 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> Something else to look into ...
>
> # ifconfig lagg0 mtu 1492
> ifconfig: ioctl (set mtu): Invalid argument
>
> This is on stable/8 r238264 when the interface was up/up and down/down
>
> Also attempted on the member interfaces dc0 and dc1
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:55:16AM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>
> On Jul 11, 2012, at 17:57 , Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>
> > On 07/11/12 14:30, g...@freebsd.org wrote:
> >> Howdy,
> >>
> >> Does anyone know the reason for this particular check in
> >> ip_output.c?
> >>
> >>if (rte !=
On Jul 11, 2012, at 17:57 , Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> On 07/11/12 14:30, g...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Does anyone know the reason for this particular check in
>> ip_output.c?
>>
>> if (rte != NULL && (rte->rt_flags & (RTF_UP|RTF_HOST))) {
>> /*
>> * This
On 07/11/12 14:30, g...@freebsd.org wrote:
Howdy,
Does anyone know the reason for this particular check in
ip_output.c?
if (rte != NULL && (rte->rt_flags & (RTF_UP|RTF_HOST))) {
/*
* This case can happen if the user changed the MTU
* of
Howdy,
Does anyone know the reason for this particular check in
ip_output.c?
if (rte != NULL && (rte->rt_flags & (RTF_UP|RTF_HOST))) {
/*
* This case can happen if the user changed the MTU
* of an interface after enabling IP on it. Becaus
11 matches
Mail list logo