Hello folks. I just noticed something that I’m sure has been true forever, but
I checked and it’s still true on my 12.3-STABLE system.
In the daily run output, I’m seeing the network interface names truncated.
This comes from netstat -I apparently only rendering the first 5 characters of
the
On 6/29/2022 10:56 AM, Chris Ross wrote:
Hello folks. I just noticed something that I’m sure has been true
forever, but I checked and it’s still true on my 12.3-STABLE system.
One of the first local mods I do is alias netstat to netstat -W for this
reason. e.g.
alias netstat netstat -W
in
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 6/29/2022 10:56 AM, Chris Ross wrote:
> > Hello folks. ?I just noticed something that I?m sure has been true
> > forever, but I checked and it?s still true on my 12.3-STABLE system.
> >
> One of the first local mods I do is alias netstat to netstat
Is there a reason (avoid bikeshedding) the field width can't be
increased to allow the bgeXhexIsVeryLong0 names to work?
I'm not saying "you can alias around this" is bad, but I sense we're
walking into a world which is where Linux is, with every physical
device called eth0/1/2 and then "which" de
Van: George Michaelson
Datum: vrijdag, 1 juli 2022 00:50
Aan: "Rodney W. Grimes"
CC: mike tancsa , Chris Ross ,
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: Netstat -i 5-character interface name length?
Is there a reason (avoid bikeshedding) the field width can't be
increas
On 1 Jul 2022, at 4:11, Ronald Klop wrote:
Van: George Michaelson
Datum: vrijdag, 1 juli 2022 00:50
Aan: "Rodney W. Grimes"
CC: mike tancsa , Chris Ross
, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: Netstat -i 5-character interface name length?
Is there a reason (avoid bikeshedding)
On 2 Jul 2022, at 10:11, Mike Karels wrote:
On 1 Jul 2022, at 4:11, Ronald Klop wrote:
Van: George Michaelson
Datum: vrijdag, 1 juli 2022 00:50
Aan: "Rodney W. Grimes"
CC: mike tancsa , Chris Ross
, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: Netstat -i 5-character interface name le
