On 9 May 2016 at 08:16, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> @Eitan
> The problem with adjusting this at syslog (or rsyslog)'s level is that you
> effectively generate the message, then have to expand even more work to
> actually suppress it, making your machine work twice for no reason.
To be clear: I wasn
On 9 May 2016 at 15:56, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 9 May 2016 at 02:02, Nick Hibma wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > In PR 166255 [1] it is suggested to allow disabling ‘promiscuous mode
> enabled’ warnings. It adds a sysctl to allow toggling this behaviour. I
> have a number of questions before I commit
On 9 May 2016 at 02:02, Nick Hibma wrote:
> Folks,
>
> In PR 166255 [1] it is suggested to allow disabling ‘promiscuous mode
> enabled’ warnings. It adds a sysctl to allow toggling this behaviour. I have
> a number of questions before I commit the patch:
I don't any concern with a sysctl, but
Folks,
In PR 166255 [1] it is suggested to allow disabling ‘promiscuous mode enabled’
warnings. It adds a sysctl to allow toggling this behaviour. I have a number of
questions before I commit the patch:
- are there any security related considerations wrt disabling this
warning?
