Archie Cobbs wrote:
>
> I'm curious what -net's opinion is on PR kern/38544:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/38554
>
> In summary: if you have a connected socket whose local IP address
> is X, and then change the interface IP address from X to Y, then
> packets written ou
> From: Wes Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Archie Cobbs wrote:
> >
> > I'm curious what -net's opinion is on PR kern/38544:
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/38554
> >
> > In summary: if you have a connected socket whose local IP address
> > is X, and then change t
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 01:16 PM, Wes Peters wrote:
Archie Cobbs wrote:
I'm curious what -net's opinion is on PR kern/38544:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/38554
In summary: if you have a connected socket whose local IP address
is X, and then change the interf
Don Bowman wrote:
> > > I'm curious what -net's opinion is on PR kern/38544:
> > >
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/38554
> > >
> > > In summary: if you have a connected socket whose local IP address
> > > is X, and then change the interface IP address from X to Y, then
>
> From: Archie Cobbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: November 21, 2002 16:54
> To: Don Bowman
> Cc: 'Wes Peters'; Archie Cobbs; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Sockets and changing IP addresses
>
>
> Don Bowman wrote:
> > > > I
Justin C. Walker wrote:
> >> Do people agree that my suggestion of returning ENETDOWN is reasonable?
> >
> > Wow. There are other possibilities, EADDRNOTAVAIL or ECONNABORTED.
> > It doesn't matter so long as it the errno is unique to this situation
> > across all syscalls that might encounter it;
Wes Peters wrote:
> > I'm curious what -net's opinion is on PR kern/38544:
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/38554
> >
> > In summary: if you have a connected socket whose local IP address
> > is X, and then change the interface IP address from X to Y, then
> > packets w
