Re: bge bug w/ out of bounds return receiver, staying in rxeof all the time, patch

2002-11-21 Thread Sam Leffler
> I would recommend a committer look this over and > commit it. If you wish, I can make the patch *just* > be the change (changing the 16-bit to 32-bit writes, > without the VPD stuff), but the other changes seemed > generally useful. Please whittle the patch down to just the bug fix; 5.0 is in c

Re: bge bug w/ out of bounds return receiver, staying in rxeof all the time, patch

2002-11-21 Thread John Polstra
In article <184f01c291c9$147e7100$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would recommend a committer look this over and > > commit it. If you wish, I can make the patch *just* > > be the change (changing the 16-bit to 32-bit writes, > > without the VPD stuff), but the oth

RE: bge bug w/ out of bounds return receiver, staying in rxeof all the time, patch

2002-11-21 Thread Don Bowman
> From: Sam Leffler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > I would recommend a committer look this over and > > commit it. If you wish, I can make the patch *just* > > be the change (changing the 16-bit to 32-bit writes, > > without the VPD stuff), but the other changes seemed > > generally useful. > > P

RE: bge bug w/ out of bounds return receiver, staying in rxeof all the time, patch

2002-11-22 Thread Don Bowman
> From: John Polstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > In article <184f01c291c9$147e7100$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would recommend a committer look this over and > > > commit it. If you wish, I can make the patch *just* > > > be the change (changing the 16-bit