On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:51:28PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 23:45:28 +0200, Vincent Jardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I agree, then... Isn't it already the purpose of RTF_CLONING ?
When should RTF_PRCLONIG be set ?
RTF_PRCLONING is set automatically by the protocol
I do not understand the purpose of the flag PRCLONING. What is it for ?
man rtalloc:
RTF_PRCLONING routes are assumed to be managed
by the protocol family and no resolution requests are made, but all
routes generated by the cloning process retain a reference to the route
from which they were
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 23:45:28 +0200, Vincent Jardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I agree, then... Isn't it already the purpose of RTF_CLONING ?
When should RTF_PRCLONIG be set ?
RTF_PRCLONING is set automatically by the protocol to cause host
routes to be generated on every unique lookup.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:45:28PM +0200, Vincent Jardin wrote:
I do not understand the purpose of the flag PRCLONING. What is it for ?
Compare the output of netstat -rn with netstat -rna, to see the
difference between a cloned and a protocol-cloned route.
BMS
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:51:28PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
RTF_XRESOLVE is set when the target of the newly cloned route is not
known by the kernel and must be set up by a user process. I'm not
sure if anything ever used this, although I guess it could be used to
implement ISIS.
I have
