Thursday, March 1, 2007, 6:29:42 PM, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: RE> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:17:29PM +0300, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: >> Is SO_NOSIGPIPE work? >> >> It try to set on socket option SO_NOSIGPIPE but anyway process >> received sigpipe. >> RE> It works, but only if you use send() instead of write(). RE> Alternatively, you can control the behavior on a per RE> message basis, by passing the MSG_NOSIGNAL in the "flags" RE> argument to the send() call (without having to set a RE> socket option).
Thanks, with send() it works fine. I think it should be documented in setsockopt(2). -- WBR, Anton Yuzhaninov
