In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Garance A Drosihn writes:
>Poul-Henning included one comment about "track records" which may
>have been a bit harsh, but if you ignore that one sentence than
>everything he said seemed pretty reasoned (ie, "calmly thought out",
>as opposed to "emotional outburst"),
> > > I would also like to point to the parallel piece of code: Jun-Itohs
> > > ALTQ for which he reliably has maintained a patch relative to the
...
> > Yes; this is an excellent example of how it can be done better.
>
> Sorry guys, but aren't you comparing apples with oranges? As far as I
No.
At 9:44 PM +0100 12/7/01, Marko Zec wrote:
Mike Smith wrote:
> > I would also like to point to the parallel piece of code: Jun-Itohs
> ALTQ for which he reliably has maintained a patch relative to the
> 4.X branch and which despite various peoples requests have not
> > haphazardly been comm
Mike Smith wrote:
> > Subject: Request to back out Luigis polled-net patch in -stable.
>
> I'm entirely in agreement with this; the decision to commit this code was
> extremely ill-advised, and the best thing we can do now for everyone's
> sake is to pull it as quickl
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Core isn't really the appropriate forum for asking for a back-out; arch
and net are where this should have been discussed and reviewed in the
first place.
> Subject: Request to back out Luigis polled-net patch in -stable.
I'm entirely in agreement with th
--- Forwarded Message
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Request to back out Luigis polled-net patch in -stable.
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 17:13:24 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have not read the ent
> > > I would also like to point to the parallel piece of code: Jun-Itohs
> > > ALTQ for which he reliably has maintained a patch relative to the
...
> > Yes; this is an excellent example of how it can be done better.
>
> Sorry guys, but aren't you comparing apples with oranges? As far as I
No.
In message , Garance A Drosihn writes:
>Poul-Henning included one comment about "track records" which may
>have been a bit harsh, but if you ignore that one sentence than
>everything he said seemed pretty reasoned (ie, "calmly thought out",
>as opposed to "e
At 9:44 PM +0100 12/7/01, Marko Zec wrote:
>Mike Smith wrote:
> > > I would also like to point to the parallel piece of code: Jun-Itohs
>> > ALTQ for which he reliably has maintained a patch relative to the
>> > 4.X branch and which despite various peoples requests have not
> > > haphazardly b
Mike Smith wrote:
> > Subject: Request to back out Luigis polled-net patch in -stable.
>
> I'm entirely in agreement with this; the decision to commit this code was
> extremely ill-advised, and the best thing we can do now for everyone's
> sake is to pull it as quickl
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Core isn't really the appropriate forum for asking for a back-out; arch
and net are where this should have been discussed and reviewed in the
first place.
> Subject: Request to back out Luigis polled-net patch in -stable.
I'm entirely in agreemen
--- Forwarded Message
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Request to back out Luigis polled-net patch in -stable.
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 17:13:24 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have not read the ent
12 matches
Mail list logo