Eric Anderson wrote:
I guess my biggest question is, why do the IPs .128, .129, .130, .131
appear in the routing tables where they're NOT defined? I don't get it?
You are not seeing forwarding table entries. You are seeing ARP entries
- the LLINFO flag is set (L). This is a legacy behaviour w
I forgot to send the ifconfig for the load balancer as well.
$ ifconfig -a
fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
inet x.y.187.253 netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.y.187.255
inet6 fe80::240:d9ff:fe02:48fe%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
inet x.y.187.8 netmask 0x broadcast x.y.187.
Ok, as a Solaris (and Linux) guy, I'm thoroughly confused by some
routing issues going on in this FreeBSD-based load balancer that I'm
working on.
This box has one upstream NIC (fxp0) and a 4-port (hub?) as fxp1.
Currently, it has two cables plugged into it (server1 and server2), and
two do
