Re: SCTP in KAME / Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it withsomething simpler

2004-10-25 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:58:32 -0500 > [EMAIL PROTECTED](Peter Lei) said: > While the SCTP API hasn't gone through last call, it's fairly > stable and we have both "converted" many applications from TCP > to SCTP using the sockets API, as well as had portability between > the KAME SCTP st

Re: SCTP in KAME / Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it withsomething simpler

2004-10-23 Thread Randall Stewart
Peter: Yes, I do get all the bugs reported to me (usually) directly.. And I try to turn them around within a week (if possible)... I have a couple on my plate right now from Chiba Hirotsugu ... in fact the last batch of bugs was also from Chiba... I know of at least 4 sites actively using the code

Re: SCTP in KAME / Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it withsomething simpler

2004-10-22 Thread Peter Lei
I think this is because any bugs that are found are usually communicated directly to us. I think Randy has a better handle on how many people are using this stack. I'm quite sure it is stable enough to go in to -current. While the SCTP API hasn't gone through last call, it's fairly stable and we h