Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:01:46PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> +> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> +> >
> +> > Hello.
> +> >
> +> > In in_pcblookup_hash() function, in the last loop if we find exact
> +> > match, we return immediately, if it is "wild", we store a poi
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:01:46PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
+> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
+> >
+> > Hello.
+> >
+> > In in_pcblookup_hash() function, in the last loop if we find exact
+> > match, we return immediately, if it is "wild", we store a pointer and
+> > we countinue looking for exa
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> In in_pcblookup_hash() function, in the last loop if we find exact
> match, we return immediately, if it is "wild", we store a pointer and
> we countinue looking for exact match.
> I wonder if this is ok, that we change pointer every time we find a
> "wil
Hello.
In in_pcblookup_hash() function, in the last loop if we find exact
match, we return immediately, if it is "wild", we store a pointer and
we countinue looking for exact match.
I wonder if this is ok, that we change pointer every time we find a
"wild" match. Is it inteded? Shouldn't it be:
