Re: Traceroute Anomaly

2004-08-20 Thread Gregory Kuhn
At 11:30 AM 8/20/2004, you wrote: In reply to Gregory Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Hello, > > > I have discovered an anomaly (I am sure it was discovered long > ago) when trying to traceroute to my FBSD 4.8 and 4.9 servers. Here are > the details. Have you set sysctl net.inet.udp.blackhol

Re: Traceroute Anomaly

2004-08-20 Thread Eli Dart
In reply to Gregory Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Hello, > > > I have discovered an anomaly (I am sure it was discovered long > ago) when trying to traceroute to my FBSD 4.8 and 4.9 servers. Here are > the details. Have you set sysctl net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 ? If so, the FreeBSD b

Re: Traceroute Anomaly

2004-08-20 Thread Barney Wolff
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 11:01:31AM -0600, Gregory Kuhn wrote: > > My question is this; > Why can I do a traceroute using the DOS version of traceroute (tracert) to > any of my FreeBSD boxes, but I am not able to do so from another FreeBSD > box? Furthermore, it is not just from my own b

Re: Traceroute Anomaly

2004-08-20 Thread Chuck Swiger
Gregory Kuhn wrote: [ ... ] Why can I do a traceroute using the DOS version of traceroute (tracert) to any of my FreeBSD boxes, but I am not able to do so from another FreeBSD box? Furthermore, it is not just from my own boxes that I am unable to do a traceroute. Using the traceroutes listed a

Traceroute Anomaly

2004-08-20 Thread Gregory Kuhn
Hello, I have discovered an anomaly (I am sure it was discovered long ago) when trying to traceroute to my FBSD 4.8 and 4.9 servers. Here are the details. 1. From any of the FBSD boxes regardless if they are on the immediate network (206.168.231.96/28, 207.174.139.224/28) or on an ent