Re: ath0: ath_rx_proc: no mbuf!

2009-09-02 Thread Stef Walter
Stef Walter wrote: > A short while ago (perhaps due to a change in traffic), every few hours, > the wireless interface becomes unresponsive, and I started seeing > thousands of lines like this in: > > ath0: ath_rx_proc: no mbuf! > ath0: ath_rx_proc: no mbuf! > ath0: ath_rx_

Re: ath0: ath_rx_proc: no mbuf!

2009-08-20 Thread Stef Walter
Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Stef. > >> ath0: ath_rx_proc: no mbuf! > >> The mbufs are in fact all used up. I allocate more via >> kern.ipc.nmbclusters, and see the same behavior. > Same problem here on 7.2-STABLE, but incresaing kern.ipc.nmbclusters > to

Re: ath0: ath_rx_proc: no mbuf!

2009-08-19 Thread Lev Serebryakov
es unresponsive, and I started seeing > thousands of lines like this in: > ath0: ath_rx_proc: no mbuf! > The mbufs are in fact all used up. I allocate more via > kern.ipc.nmbclusters, and see the same behavior. Same problem here on 7.2-STABLE, but incresaing kern.ipc.nmbclusters to 65536

ath0: ath_rx_proc: no mbuf!

2009-08-19 Thread Stef Walter
th_rx_proc: no mbuf! ath0: ath_rx_proc: no mbuf! ath0: ath_rx_proc: no mbuf! ath0: ath_rx_proc: no mbuf! ath0: ath_rx_proc: no mbuf! Has anyone seen this problem? An mbuf leak? Or perhaps fixed something like it in a later version of FreeBSD? Would upgrading the FreeBSD version fix this? It