Re: em0 failed to work at 1000baseTX. WAS [Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX]

2007-06-04 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Hi, Jack Vogel wrote: On 5/31/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thank you very much for the help Jack :)) Unfortunately I'm off next four days and probably will not be able to test it before Monday. Btw any chances to have patch for releng_6 or the difference in the drivers is too

Re: em0 failed to work at 1000baseTX. WAS [Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX]

2007-05-31 Thread Jack Vogel
On 5/31/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thank you very much for the help Jack :)) Unfortunately I'm off next four days and probably will not be able to test it before Monday. Btw any chances to have patch for releng_6 or the difference in the drivers is too big ? :) Welcome, turn

Re: em0 failed to work at 1000baseTX. WAS [Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX]

2007-05-31 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Jack Vogel wrote: On 5/29/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/27/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/27/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Jack, > > > > Jack Vogel wrote: > > > Stefan, > > > > > > I am having a long weekend and am supposed to be

Re: em0 failed to work at 1000baseTX. WAS [Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX]

2007-05-30 Thread Jack Vogel
On 5/29/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/27/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/27/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Jack, > > > > Jack Vogel wrote: > > > Stefan, > > > > > > I am having a long weekend and am supposed to be doing > > > somethi

Re: em0 failed to work at 1000baseTX. WAS [Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX]

2007-05-29 Thread Jack Vogel
On 5/27/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/27/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jack, > > Jack Vogel wrote: > > Stefan, > > > > I am having a long weekend and am supposed to be doing > > something other than this :) However, when I get back in the office > > o

Re: em0 failed to work at 1000baseTX. WAS [Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX]

2007-05-27 Thread Jack Vogel
On 5/27/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jack, Jack Vogel wrote: > Stefan, > > I am having a long weekend and am supposed to be doing > something other than this :) However, when I get back in the office > on Tuesday I will see if I can repro this, so just to make sure, t

Re: em0 failed to work at 1000baseTX. WAS [Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX]

2007-05-27 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Hi Jack, Jack Vogel wrote: Stefan, I am having a long weekend and am supposed to be doing something other than this :) However, when I get back in the office on Tuesday I will see if I can repro this, so just to make sure, tell me what the PCI ID of the two cards are when it fails with

Re: em0 failed to work at 1000baseTX. WAS [Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX]

2007-05-27 Thread Jack Vogel
Stefan, I am having a long weekend and am supposed to be doing something other than this :) However, when I get back in the office on Tuesday I will see if I can repro this, so just to make sure, tell me what the PCI ID of the two cards are when it fails with Intel on both sides, that sho

em0 failed to work at 1000baseTX. WAS [Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX]

2007-05-27 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Hi, MQ wrote: Actually, I'd rather consider the bge(4) has some problems with its media negotiation. It seems that the problem you described was just the same with mine as I had mentioned earlier this year. I encountered the problem as I wanted a BCM5701 and a BCM5780 to connect to each oth

Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX

2007-05-26 Thread MQ
2007/4/24, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello, I'm trying to get two gigabit network cards to work together. em0: port 0x1000-0x101f mem 0xf050-0xf051,0xf0524000-0xf0524fff irq 19 at device 25.0 on pci0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:25:0: class=0x02 card=0x2800103c chip=0x104a8086 re

Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX

2007-05-26 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Hi Jack, Jack Vogel wrote: On 5/7/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi again, Jack Vogel wrote: > > The new driver I just checked into CURRENT has this fix, I hope its > going to be in the May snapshot, Stefan, can you try CURRENT to > see if it solves your problem? > > Jack I hav

Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX

2007-05-13 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Jack Vogel wrote: On 5/7/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi again, Jack Vogel wrote: > > The new driver I just checked into CURRENT has this fix, I hope its > going to be in the May snapshot, Stefan, can you try CURRENT to > see if it solves your problem? > > Jack I have problems

Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX

2007-05-11 Thread Jack Vogel
On 5/7/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi again, Jack Vogel wrote: > > The new driver I just checked into CURRENT has this fix, I hope its > going to be in the May snapshot, Stefan, can you try CURRENT to > see if it solves your problem? > > Jack I have problems with loading if_em

Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX

2007-05-07 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Hi again, Jack Vogel wrote: The new driver I just checked into CURRENT has this fix, I hope its going to be in the May snapshot, Stefan, can you try CURRENT to see if it solves your problem? Jack I have problems with loading if_em as module on 7.0-current from today: link_elf: symbol e1000_

Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX

2007-05-07 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Hi, Jack Vogel wrote: -cut- The new driver I just checked into CURRENT has this fix, I hope its going to be in the May snapshot, Stefan, can you try CURRENT to see if it solves your problem? Jack I'll need some time for this :) But my idea was to run some benchmarks on freebsd 6.2-release an

Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX

2007-05-04 Thread Jack Vogel
On 4/25/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/25/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Jack Vogel wrote: > > On 4/24/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I'm trying to get two gigabit network cards to work together. > >> > >> em0: port

Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX

2007-04-25 Thread Jack Vogel
On 4/25/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Jack Vogel wrote: > On 4/24/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to get two gigabit network cards to work together. >> >> em0: port >> 0x1000-0x101f mem 0xf050-0xf051,0xf0524000-0xf0524fff i

Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX

2007-04-25 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Hello, Jack Vogel wrote: On 4/24/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I'm trying to get two gigabit network cards to work together. em0: port 0x1000-0x101f mem 0xf050-0xf051,0xf0524000-0xf0524fff irq 19 at device 25.0 on pci0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:25:0: class=0x02 c

Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX

2007-04-24 Thread .
[ Charset Windows-1251 unsupported, converting... ] > I'm trying to get two gigabit network cards to work together. > When I connect both networks without switch e.g. directly they auto > negotiate to: > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > but I want 1000baseTX :( Look at link0 in man bge M

Re: em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX

2007-04-24 Thread Jack Vogel
On 4/24/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I'm trying to get two gigabit network cards to work together. em0: port 0x1000-0x101f mem 0xf050-0xf051,0xf0524000-0xf0524fff irq 19 at device 25.0 on pci0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:25:0: class=0x02 card=0x2800103c chip=0x104a8

em0 - bge0 failed to work at 1000baseTX

2007-04-24 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Hello, I'm trying to get two gigabit network cards to work together. em0: port 0x1000-0x101f mem 0xf050-0xf051,0xf0524000-0xf0524fff irq 19 at device 25.0 on pci0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:25:0: class=0x02 card=0x2800103c chip=0x104a8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corpo