grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1

Hello, I am freebsd newbie, so bear with me. I was searching if its possible to bond 2 ethernet interfaces as 1 under FreeBsd. Ie similiar to creating a trunk. Any references? Thanks, -Hussain ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.

RE: grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1

Look into bridge(4). > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hussain Ali > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1 > > > > Hello, > &g

RE: grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1

1, 2003 2:59 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1 > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I am freebsd newbie, so bear with me. I was searching if its possible > > to bond 2 ethernet interfaces as 1 under Fr

Re: grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1

There are couple modules: ng_one2many, there is a man page for it; ng_fec - no man page, but here are some info: http://www.bsd-dk.dk/archives/2001/Mar/0027.html http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/96/340308/2003-09-29/2003-10-05/0 --- Hussain Ali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am

Re: grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1

Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, kfl wrote: Look into bridge(4). more likely he wants something like ng_fec or ng_one2many Unless performance is the reason for bonding the ether channels... Can't we steal the Linux code? ;-) ___ [EMAIL PR

Re: grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1

Julian Elischer wrote: more likely he wants something like ng_fec or ng_one2many Unless performance is the reason for bonding the ether channels... Can't we steal the Linux code? ;-) is the netgraph version particularly slow? Not slower than a single ether channel, no ;-) Considerably slower tha

Re: grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, kfl wrote: > > > > > >>Look into bridge(4). > > > > > > more likely he wants something like ng_fec or ng_one2many > > Unless performance is the reason for bonding the ether channels... > > C

Re: grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1

On Thursday 11 December 2003 23:14, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > >>>more likely he wants something like ng_fec or ng_one2many > >> > >>Unless performance is the reason for bonding the ether channels... > >> > >>Can't we steal the Linux code? ;-) > > > > is the netgraph version

Re: grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1

Juan Rodriguez Hervella: >On Thursday 11 December 2003 23:14, Michael Sierchio wrote: >> Julian Elischer wrote: >> >>>more likely he wants something like ng_fec or ng_one2many >> >> >> >>Unless performance is the reason for bonding the ether channels... >> >> >> >>Can't we steal the Linux code? ;-)

Re: grouping 2 or more interfaces as 1

> In theory, yes. In practice, throughput is pretty often limited by PC > architectural issues. Consider, for example, PCI bus speed... Also > consider the overhead of actually distributing traffic between the > physical interfaces... > So i can get 200Mb/s out of 2 interfaces. (Theortically), t