Hello networkers,
I've rolled out a new patch & README here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/newcarp/
The most important change since last version is not sending
spurious graturious ARP announce on startup.
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
___
freeb
On 14.10.2011 21:12, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:06:57PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> > Won't ifconfig it down work?
A>
A> Not if I want to continue to use the primary or other non-carp address.
Well, the best idea for that case would be switch them to backup mode.
In
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:06:57PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> > Won't ifconfig it down work?
A>
A> Not if I want to continue to use the primary or other non-carp address.
Well, the best idea for that case would be switch them to backup mode.
In presense of active master, they won't show up
On 14.10.2011 20:48, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:14:34PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> On 14.10.2011 20:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:43:33PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> > A> On 13.10.2011 18:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A> > A> >
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:14:34PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> On 14.10.2011 20:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:43:33PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> > A> On 13.10.2011 18:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A> > A> > Hello networkers,
A> > A> >
A> > A> > I've upda
On 14.10.2011 20:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:43:33PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> On 13.10.2011 18:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A> > Hello networkers,
A> >
A> > I've updated patch& README here:
A> >
A> > http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/newcarp/
A> >
On 13.10.2011 18:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Hello networkers,
I've updated patch& README here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/newcarp/
Going to commit it to head/ soon. Then I'd like to make
a run through carp-related PRs, update documentation, settle
things a bit... and then ma
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:43:33PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> On 13.10.2011 18:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A> >Hello networkers,
A> >
A> >I've updated patch& README here:
A> >
A> >http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/newcarp/
A> >
A> >Going to commit it to head/ soon. Then I'd lik
Hello networkers,
I've updated patch & README here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/newcarp/
Going to commit it to head/ soon. Then I'd like to make
a run through carp-related PRs, update documentation, settle
things a bit... and then make more hacking to restore the
arpbalance featur
On 8/15/11 5:07 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Hi David and networkers,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 03:56:28PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
D> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:32:06PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
D> > D> My two cents.
D> > D>
D> > D> We rely on the arp load balance feature. We
On Aug 15, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 07:56:14AM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
> D> > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 03:56:28PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
> D> > D> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:32:06PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
> D> > D> > D> My two cents.
> D
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 07:56:14AM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
D> > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 03:56:28PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
D> > D> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:32:06PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
D> > D> > D> My two cents.
D> > D> > D>
D> > D> > D> We rely on the arp load balance fea
On Aug 15, 2011, at 7:07 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Hi David and networkers,
>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 03:56:28PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
> D> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:32:06PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
> D> > D> My two cents.
> D> > D>
> D> > D> We rely on the arp load balance f
Hi David and networkers,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 03:56:28PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
D> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:32:06PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
D> > D> My two cents.
D> > D>
D> > D> We rely on the arp load balance feature. We certainly don't find it
useless. Looking at ip loa
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:32:06PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote:
D> My two cents.
D>
D> We rely on the arp load balance feature. We certainly don't find it
useless. Looking at ip load balancing, it would also mean that we would no
longer be able to grow bandwidth with additional systems since
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:04:14PM -0700, Rudy (bulk) wrote:
R> > I'd like to present for review and early testing (for brave ones)
R> > a new CARP implementation.
R>
R> Super! I'll use it but am not brave enough for alpha. Maybe beta. :)
R>
R> Will this s
sort of load balancing feature be
included when this goes live.
--
DaveD
On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Hello networkers,
>
> I'd like to present for review and early testing (for brave ones)
> a new CARP implementation. The reason for this rewrite wa
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Hello networkers,
I'd like to present for review and early testing (for brave ones)
a new CARP implementation.
Super! I'll use it but am not brave enough for alpha. Maybe beta. :)
Will this support multiple VHID per interfac
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 02:47:08PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
F> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
F> > F> However, I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for removing the carpX
F> > F> pseudo-interface. It's really nice having the symmetry between carpX,
F> > F> vla
2011/8/11 Gleb Smirnoff
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
> F> However, I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for removing the carpX
> F> pseudo-interface. It's really nice having the symmetry between carpX,
> F> vlanX, brX, and other pseudo-interfaces, and keepin
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
F> However, I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for removing the carpX
F> pseudo-interface. It's really nice having the symmetry between carpX,
F> vlanX, brX, and other pseudo-interfaces, and keeping the configuration
F> details sep
2011/8/10 Gleb Smirnoff
> I'd like to present for review and early testing (for brave ones)
> a new CARP implementation. The reason for this rewrite was that CARP
> protocol actually doesn't bring a new interface, but is a property of
> interface address. Rewriting i
Hello networkers,
I'd like to present for review and early testing (for brave ones)
a new CARP implementation. The reason for this rewrite was that CARP
protocol actually doesn't bring a new interface, but is a property of
interface address. Rewriting it in this way helps to remo
23 matches
Mail list logo
