https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234026
--- Comment #3 from Stanislav Trofimov ---
(In reply to Stanislav Trofimov from comment #1)
Latest p6 update fixed my problem
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234026
Dmitry changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dkun...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Dmi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234026
Stanislav Trofimov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||norespo...@yandex.ru
--- Comm
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234026
Bug ID: 234026
Summary: [panic] [dummynet] Repeatable panic in dummynet due to
locking issues and use-after-free
Product: Base System
Version: 11.2-STABLE
Hardware
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171711
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|In
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171711
--- Comment #8 from dbl...@interplex.ca ---
I just opened a new bug:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199096 since my error is
similar but different.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171711
--- Comment #5 from eu...@grosbein.net ---
(In reply to Hiren Panchasara from comment #4)
This PR is probably duplicate of my later PR 149513 that contains more details.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171711
--- Comment #6 from eu...@grosbein.net ---
(In reply to Hiren Panchasara from comment #4)
This PR is probably duplicate of my later PR *195102* that contains more
details.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171711
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171711
--- Comment #4 from Hiren Panchasara ---
(In reply to dblais from comment #2)
I cannot look into this right now but noticed that what you are reporting looks
different than the original post. That seems double free and what you are
seeing i
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171711
--- Comment #3 from dbl...@interplex.ca ---
Sorry, some errors in my previous post:
"Don't know how it scales exactly (linear, quadratic or exponential) nor if it
scales with traffic or the amount of pppoe clients but it sure if one of the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171711
dbl...@interplex.ca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dbl...@interplex.ca
--- Comme
Synopsis: [dummynet] [panic] Kernel panic in dummynet
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Oct 5 03:50:42 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171
Synopsis: [dummynet] [panic] kernel panic in dummynet
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: ae
State-Changed-When: Fri Jun 17 11:33:59 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
Feedback requested.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=157
The following reply was made to PR kern/157802; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Andrey V. Elsukov"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, alexey_kovale...@inbox.ru
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/157802: [dummynet] [panic] kernel panic in dummynet
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:05:59 +0400
Hi, Alexey
Old Synopsis: kernel panic in dummynet
New Synopsis: [dummynet] [panic] kernel panic in dummynet
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jun 12 21:53:36 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
reclassify.
h
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 21 March 2011 12:43, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > This is a 8.1 box, not very much loaded.
> > It has two simple dummynet rules.
> > That's the first time it panics there. Any hints?
> >
> > db> x/s *panicstr
> > 0:
On 21 March 2011 12:43, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is a 8.1 box, not very much loaded.
> It has two simple dummynet rules.
> That's the first time it panics there. Any hints?
>
> db> x/s *panicstr
> 0: *** error reading from address 0 ***
> db> bt
> Tracing pid 0 tid 100116 td 0xf
Hi.
This is a 8.1 box, not very much loaded.
It has two simple dummynet rules.
That's the first time it panics there. Any hints?
db> x/s *panicstr
0: *** error reading from address 0 ***
db> bt
Tracing pid 0 tid 100116 td 0xff000ab057c0
m_copym() at m_copym+0x37
ip_fragment() at ip_fragm
19 matches
Mail list logo
