Re: trunk interface (was (no subject))

2006-05-19 Thread Julian Elischer
Thomas wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 18.05.2006, 18:05 -0700 schrieb Julian Elischer: Thomas Vogt wrote: Hi Thanks. I know about the netgraph ether/fec interfaces. But I thought about a solution without netgraph. AFAIK Netgraph implies overhead and ng_ehter is more complicated to set

Re: trunk interface (was (no subject))

2006-05-19 Thread Thomas
Am Donnerstag, den 18.05.2006, 18:05 -0700 schrieb Julian Elischer: > Thomas Vogt wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Thanks. I know about the netgraph ether/fec interfaces. But I thought > > about a solution without netgraph. AFAIK Netgraph implies overhead > > and ng_ehter is more complicated to set up.

Re: trunk interface (was (no subject))

2006-05-18 Thread Julian Elischer
Thomas Vogt wrote: Hi Thanks. I know about the netgraph ether/fec interfaces. But I thought about a solution without netgraph. AFAIK Netgraph implies overhead and ng_ehter is more complicated to set up. This is a problem with non technical people. I'm happy they already know a bit about

Re: trunk interface (was (no subject))

2006-05-18 Thread Thomas Vogt
Hi Thanks. I know about the netgraph ether/fec interfaces. But I thought about a solution without netgraph. AFAIK Netgraph implies overhead and ng_ehter is more complicated to set up. This is a problem with non technical people. I'm happy they already know a bit about ifconfig commands.