Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x (some tweaking and more results)

2005-05-04 Thread Steven Hartland
Did you also try the sys/param.h change that helped here. Also when testing on FS I found bs=1024k to degrade performance try with 64k. Is this a raid volume? If so on my setup anything other that a 16k stripe and performance went out the window. For the 'time' its easier to understand if u use: /u

Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x (some tweaking and more results)

2005-05-04 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 05:31 PM 02/05/2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Tancsa writes: >Using an amrc controller in RAID5, it doesnt make a difference really on >the dd stuff - read or write-- perhaps 2-5MB difference on the faster >side. Raw reads and writes whether I use da0 or da0