On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:35:40PM -0500, Jonathan Noack wrote:
> Sounds great! When do you begin? ;-)
>
> This has been proposed before and has been (to my knowledge) universally
> accepted as a Good Idea. If you have the interest and time to devote to
> it, I would urge you to work on it.
> This sounds somewhat similar to Solaris dtrace stuff?
Dtrace can be a (very useful) component for collecting
performance metrics. What I am talking about is a framework
where you'd apply dtrace or other micro/system level
performance tests or benchmarks on a regular basis for a
variety of machi
* Petri Helenius ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050510 12:52]:
>
> This sounds somewhat similar to Solaris dtrace stuff?
>
> Pete
This sounds more like a QA/Feedback process. dtrace isn't
just a conglomeration of the usual performance metrics. It's
closer to a total revamp of how you perform said metrics
This sounds somewhat similar to Solaris dtrace stuff?
Pete
Bakul Shah wrote:
This thread makes me wonder if there is value in runing
performance tests on a regular basis. This would give an
early warning of any peformance loss and can be a useful
forensic tool (one can pinpoint when some performan
On 5/10/2005 10:18 AM, Bakul Shah wrote:
This thread makes me wonder if there is value in runing
performance tests on a regular basis. This would give an
early warning of any peformance loss and can be a useful
forensic tool (one can pinpoint when some performance curve
changed discontinuously eve
This thread makes me wonder if there is value in runing
performance tests on a regular basis. This would give an
early warning of any peformance loss and can be a useful
forensic tool (one can pinpoint when some performance curve
changed discontinuously even though at the time of change it
may be
Jonathan Noack wrote:
On 5/9/2005 12:31 PM, Pete French wrote:
5.3 ships with SMP turned on, which makes lock operations rather
expensive on single-processor machines. 4.x does not have SMP
turned on by default. Would you be able to re-run your test with
SMP turned off?
I just ran a test here w
