--- JG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyway, you could try the dd thing; something like
> > # dd if=mysql-m.tgz | tar -zxvf -
> > and see if it makes any diference.
>
> Not for me, I've very similar result. Is there way to do
> something
> reverse - extract tar file to stdout or sth. and then "
> Anyway, you could try the dd thing; something like
> # dd if=mysql-m.tgz | tar -zxvf -
> and see if it makes any diference.
Not for me, I've very similar result. Is there way to do something
reverse - extract tar file to stdout or sth. and then "dd" it to files?
JG
__
> Will noatime make a difference when unpacking a tar archive (assuming an
> otherwise idle system, at least)? My understanding of atime is that it
> might slow down the disk for later accesses due to atime writes, but
> when creating files it shouldn't have any effect. Is that not correct?
Yes,
I must be working too much... I can´t see where I took the DDS-thing
from... O_o Sorry, now I see it´s a disk-only operation. >X(
Anyway, you could try the dd thing; something like
# dd if=mysql-m.tgz | tar -zxvf -
and see if it makes any diference.
There was a relatively new thread in April/
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:49:39PM +0200 I heard the voice of
JG, and lo! it spake thus:
Anyway, it's only a few secs difference, so the problem must be with
write. Any other hints? :)
Gentoo is using GNU tar, 5.4 is using bsdtar. Try installing gtar on
Free
On 08/24/05 11:33, JG wrote:
I had to unpack a lot of tar archives and I occasional noticed terrible
bad performance on freebsd5.
This is my test file:
854251520 24 Sie 12:13 mysql-m.tgz
There are some real MySQL tables in it, it has been done with tar
-cvf. This archive contains about 146.000
> Might be silly but do u get similar results if u:
> 1. expand to a memory backed disk
> 2. expand to /dev/null
Hello,
Thank you for test advice.
FreeBSD:
# time tar -xf mysql-m.tgz -O > /dev/null
1.125u 3.007s 0:04.13 99.7% 41+323k 0+0io 0pf+0w
# time tar -xf mysql-m.tgz -O > /dev/null
1.1
> Gentoo is using GNU tar, 5.4 is using bsdtar. Try installing gtar on
> FreeBSD and see what the time is.
"I've tested bsdtar and gtar from ports (btw. gtar seems to be
faster)."
It's not big difference.
JG
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org maili
Hi,
I´ve got the same kind of problem, not only with DDS-[234] tapes, but
also with "all-powerful-with-bells-and-whistles" AIT-3 units, with
controllers ranging from Adaptec stock 2940 to PCI-X Ultra-320... almost
same results.
The problems seems to lie in tar itself; I read there´s something
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:49:39PM +0200 I heard the voice of
JG, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Anyway, it's only a few secs difference, so the problem must be with
> write. Any other hints? :)
Gentoo is using GNU tar, 5.4 is using bsdtar. Try installing gtar on
FreeBSD and see what the time is.
Might be silly but do u get similar results if u:
1. expand to a memory backed disk
2. expand to /dev/null
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "JG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I had to unpack a lot of tar archives and I occasional noticed terrible
bad performance on freebsd5.
Hello,
I had to unpack a lot of tar archives and I occasional noticed terrible
bad performance on freebsd5.
This is my test file:
854251520 24 Sie 12:13 mysql-m.tgz
There are some real MySQL tables in it, it has been done with tar
-cvf. This archive contains about 146.000 small files.
---
Hi.
I'm looking at upgrading my db-server. It's currently running FreeBSD
5.4-release and postgresql 7.4.8 on a quad TX46 with 4 GB RAM.
I've searched for comparative benchmarks pitting the TX46 agains a Sun
v40z, but haven't found any that indicates what system does fare the
best. The planned up
13 matches
Mail list logo
