Nick Evans wrote:
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:24:18 -0500
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have done many tests to try to determine the poor performance on my
systems (FreeBSD-current connected directly to Windows XP via identical
Intel Pro 1000 cards) and my only conclusion is that Sa
Just did a few quick tests on 5.4 here ( not upgraded to 6.0 yet )
and on Gig I get a max of 20Mb/s using samba with the following
options:
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=131072 SO_SNDBUF=131072
max xmit = 131072
With ftp I can get 45Mb/s
Steve
==
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:24:18 -0500
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arkadi Shishlov wrote:
> > Joao Barros wrote:
> >
> >> On a P4 3.06GHz with HTT enabled and ULE I get the same results.
> >> I get a flat line at 58% looking at the bandwith in task manager on a
> >> Windows 2003 Serve
Arkadi Shishlov wrote:
Joao Barros wrote:
On a P4 3.06GHz with HTT enabled and ULE I get the same results.
I get a flat line at 58% looking at the bandwith in task manager on a
Windows 2003 Server while doing a cached read.
I can get up to 70% bandwith during writes.
Percentages are relative
Joao Barros wrote:
> On a P4 3.06GHz with HTT enabled and ULE I get the same results.
> I get a flat line at 58% looking at the bandwith in task manager on a
> Windows 2003 Server while doing a cached read.
> I can get up to 70% bandwith during writes.
> Percentages are relative to 100Mbits bandwit
On 11/9/05, Joao Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/9/05, Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, Joao,
> >
> > > Last month I started a thread[1] on current@ about this, but I guess I
> > > should have done it here, my apologies for that.
> > >
> > > After my initial post I did so
