On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:31:03 +
Joao Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/10/05, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> >
> > > I have done many tests to try to determine the poor performance on my
> > > systems (FreeBSD-current connected dir
On 11/11/05, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:54 AM 11/11/2005, Joao Barros wrote:
> >Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
> >Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
> > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
At 08:54 AM 11/11/2005, Joao Barros wrote:
Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #5: Thu Nov 10 13:57:54 WET 2005
[EMAI
On 11/11/05, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Joao Barros wrote:
>
> > I tried using a single drive, an IDE and a SCSI-2 and on 2 machines at
> > work both with a RAID1. Even better, there is a part in my initial email
> > where I mention that having a 700MB file cac
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Joao Barros wrote:
I tried using a single drive, an IDE and a SCSI-2 and on 2 machines at
work both with a RAID1. Even better, there is a part in my initial email
where I mention that having a 700MB file cached (iostat reported no
reads) the results were the same. With thi
